The dichotomy between fact and non-fact (disinfo) and Q can never be established until the future events prove past ones.

It’s as if I were to tell you two lies and a truth, told you to trust me, and then I told you some things I say are lies for protection. It’s for reasonable reasons sure, however you’ll never know what the lies were until the truth is out.

Q said they were a team of ten. 7 military, 3 civilian. This could have been a lie to distract from the truth that Q could be way more than 10 or even as little as one.

For those who are capable to piecing together graphology, most likely in the field on criminal investigation, could tell you that Q uses terminology that is quite specific. It’s Socratic and likewise digestible.

In fact, if one were to read and listen to how Elon Musk speaks and writes, you can find a very large portion of similarities between the two. Grammatically and with similar syntax.

I’m not saying that Elon Musk is Q. I will say that the similarity is so close in so many ways that if he were to be confronted over his possible connection with Q, I think that it’s possible he may know who Q is or that he might even be a part of the “team” Q referred to being.

This comes as a moment in time where Elon’s corporate visions collide with possible outcomes. Pairing Neurolink with AI and massive data farms would potentially create a semi-omniscient powerful machine capable of being Q.