Now it's a religion?
Isn't it a race? Bloodline?
No?
Wait, so if its a religion, everyone can join, which means "they" doesn't exist.
>He can have people work on the site
Developers aren't free. And competent developers are rare.
Yes, never hire a consultant. They are all full of shit.
In this satanic world, competent devs by definition have to earn less than incompetent (also corrupt) ones, simply because the incompetent (and corrupt) ones get paid again for a bugfix, and then again and again and again. That's also the trick of consultants.
>Use some of that 3rd world to hire on odesk or fiverr
Do you understand that an incompetent dev may fuck this site up and/or add security flaws?
So who is testing all the changes and makes sure that exactly only that is touched?
The incompetent dev that you just hired?
Ah, so you now also hired a 2nd dev.
How do you make sure that dev knows what he is doing?
>Did you know that the code is just text?
Well duh, all source code is text. Shocking, isn't it.
You can do all sorts of shitt with changes to source code, you know.
>A religion has rules that limit who can join.
But the daughter of DJT joined, didn't she?
What are the rules in regards of the "Jewish religion"?
Also aren't the Rothschilds converted Jews? Malta?
>if you don't accept and obey their established rules, Muslim people will reject you and say, you are not Muslim, because you are not following their rules.
Isn't that a good thing?
And what's the problem again?
Let's imagine you pretend to be Christian and then go to a church and do crazy shit to the Jesus statue there and get thrown out.
Is that the fault of the religion or of you being a jack ass and a larper?
>deployment
This is about code changes, complicated code changes, like adding major features.
How does Jim make sure the new code is properly done?
How does he make sure that there isn't a flaw in it, which can erase database tables either intentionally or by accident?
Is Jim an expert developer?
Are you?
If he was an expert developer himself, he wouldn't need to hire one.
So now we have 3 people already.
Again: how do you know the auditor actually knows what he is doing?
All the auditors i experienced had none. They ran premade scripts to check for certain things and that's it. And gave retarded commendations.
>production deployment
Just because you can transport changes to production doesn't mean you can judge the work of others.
How do you make sure no security flaws are added?
>Just trust this other person
As we go further and further we hire 10 or 20 people. Maybe a HR person as well?
Transporting things to production is pretty simple compared to software development.
I'm calling no one dumb.
And I'm actually speaking of my own experience (not this here specifically).