Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 8:32 a.m. No.16304291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4297 >>4358 >>4376

George W. Bush Tells Pranksters Why West Broke Promise to Russia Not to Expand NATO

 

Vovan and Lexus, the Russian pranksters known for trolling Western politicians, celebrities and other public figures, revealed Tuesday that they had tricked George W Bush into speaking with them. The former president played an instrumental role in the second wave of NATO’s eastward expansion, and the first Euromaidan crisis in Ukraine in 2004.

The United States didn’t keep its word to Moscow on NATO’s eastward expansion due to shifting circumstances, and the Bush administration always wanted to see Ukraine join the Western alliance, George W Bush has revealed in a candid interview with Vovan and Lexus.

 

I wanted [Russia] on the fringe of NATO, I wanted Ukraine in NATO,” Bush, who served as US president between 2001 and 2009, told the pranksters, who posed as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in a portion of the interview that aired Thursday at Russian educational forum.

 

“I thought for a while that Russia would be more cooperative. And then [Vladimir] Putin changed dramatically,” Bush said.

 

“I felt that Ukraine needed to be in the EU and NATO,” he added.

(Cheney made that decision, this fool did nothing but rubberstamp murder of innocents WW)

 

Asked to address Russia’s oft-repeated argument that James Baker, the US secretary of state under George H.W. Bush, had promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev not to expand the bloc eastward in 1990, Bush Jr. suggested thatsuch promises were irrelevant because they were made a long time ago.

 

(He’s a real idiot, all countries should already know, do not trust any treaty or promise of the US, which they shouldnt ever!)

 

“Listen, times change. Baker was the secretary of state with my dad, which was years ago, and so uh, the United States [was working under the] principle of adjusting to the times. And that’s why we’re trying to show our support for your country now,” he said.

 

Asked whether he agreed with the sentiment that the conflict in Ukraine was really a confrontation between the West and Russia, Bush answered curtly “Yeah.”

 

As for the argument that the US recognition of Kosovo in the 2000s on the grounds of its right to ‘self-determination’ from Serbia paved the way for Russia’s recognition of the Donbass republics, Bush appeared briefly stumped, before assuring that “if you prevail, or when you prevail, a lot of these various issues are gonna be off the table.”

 

Your mission is to destroy as many Russian troops as you can, and the question is, will you continue receiving the help you need. And I certainly hope so,” Bush said. He added that it was “very important” for the US to “continue to lead” in aiding Ukraine in achieving its goals.

 

George W. Bush presided over the second wave of NATO's post-Cold War expansion, welcoming Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia into the bloc in 2004. Between 1999 and 2020, 14 nations of the defunct Warsaw Pact, the former Yugoslavia or the ex-USSR itself were absorbed by NATO. At its Bucharest summit in 2008, the alliance recognized Ukraine and Georgia's "aspirations" toward eventual NATO membership.

 

Vladimir ‘Vovan’ Kuznetsov and Alexei ‘Lexus’ Stolyarov are a Russian comedy duo that has spent more than a decade trolling politicians, celebrities, royals and other public figures around the world.

 

Their YouTube channel was taken down in March after they released videos of intimate conversations with British Defence Chief Ben Wallace and Home Secretary Priti Patel, revealing the true extent of covert UK military support for Ukraine, and the possibility of seizing Russian tycoons’ properties in London and handing them over to members of Ukraine’s political elite.

 

(I hope to God this reptile Dubya is tried first and harshest for crimes against humanity! Obama and Clinton too, altogether)

 

https://sputniknews.com/20220519/george-w-bush-tells-pranksters-why-west-broke-promise-to-russia-not-to-expand-nato-1095637758.html

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 9:02 a.m. No.16304421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4429

>>16303505PB

 

nominating past post asNotable

 

Nina Jancowitz wants to be rich and famous

 

Imo

Apparently she didnt have fuck anyone just aid in the killing of innocent Russian ethnics in Ukraine. And she built the Ukraine propaganda. Only when she announced herself as the minister of Truth in the US she became really famous for the hideously insane she is, along with her ridiculous mandates of being able to cancel anyone that disagrees with her. But I’m sure she had sex with satanists. So she got her wish!

 

She will be ultra-famous at a highest level later when she’s arrested, tried and convicted of crimes agaist humanity. And trying to destroy our constitutional republic

 

Man this bitch pisses me off!

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 9:29 a.m. No.16304559   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4563 >>4582

>>16301946 5th circuit court has ruled that the SEC is unconstitutional

 

This ishuge. SEC is basically the mafia for large conglomerates and the harass and lie to destroy companies. They have tried to destroy many start ups that would change processes, equipment and results, in every field possible. They tried their hardest to destroy Tesla and charged him for lying (which he didnt) when he stated Tesla had the funding.

 

If this goes through and SEC is dismantled or reformed, the whole sham of the stock market gets exposed! =HUGE== I say!

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 10:04 a.m. No.16304692   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16304504

I think Durham team allowed them on purpose, they will know who messed up jury deliberations and be thrown out or on notice, “don’t fuck around, or you’ll find out”, its better to know in the beginning of the trial instead afterwards

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 10:07 a.m. No.16304708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4728

The only reason other republicans got on board because they saw the support of Rand Paul’s demand, otherwise the cowards would have gone along with it

 

 

https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/1527327977066749961?s=20&t=E_zfAHdpqN14yTdN2gTP9w

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 10:11 a.m. No.16304727   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4738 >>4765 >>4786

Did Janco get a job at twitter, she sounds like it, now the board is embedded as twitter employees

 

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1527321910773575680?s=20&t=E_zfAHdpqN14yTdN2gTP9w

Anonymous ID: 555a6f May 19, 2022, 10:18 a.m. No.16304760   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4764 >>4787 >>4795 >>4823 >>4834 >>4867 >>4882 >>4919 >>4996

DOJ sabotaging Durham

Thursday, May 19, 2022

Department of Justice Announces New Policy for Charging Cases under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

 

The Department of Justice today announced the revision of its policy regarding charging violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

 

The policy for the first time directs that good-faith security research should not be charged. Good faith security research means accessing a computer solely for purposes of good-faith testing, investigation, and/or correction of a security flaw or vulnerability, where such activity is carried out in a manner designed to avoid any harm to individuals or the public, and where the information derived from the activity is used primarily to promote the security or safety of the class of devices, machines, or online services to which the accessed computer belongs, or those who use such devices, machines, or online services.

 

“Computer security research is a key driver of improved cybersecurity,” said Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco. “The department has never been interested in prosecuting good-faith computer security research as a crime, and today’s announcement promotes cybersecurity by providing clarity for good-faith security researchers who root out vulnerabilities for the common good.”

 

The new policy states explicitly the longstanding practice that “the department’s goals for CFAA enforcement are to promote privacy and cybersecurity by upholding the legal right of individuals, network owners, operators, and other persons to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information stored in their information systems.” Accordingly, the policy clarifies that hypothetical CFAA violations that have concerned some courts and commentators are not to be charged. Embellishing an online dating profile contrary to the terms of service of the dating website; creating fictional accounts on hiring, housing, or rental websites; using a pseudonym on a social networking site that prohibits them; checking sports scores at work; paying bills at work; or violating an access restriction contained in a term of service are not themselves sufficient to warrant federal criminal charges. The policy focuses the department’s resources on cases where a defendant is either not authorized at all to access a computer or was authorized to access one part of a computer — such as one email account — and, despite knowing about that restriction, accessed a part of the computer to which his authorized access did not extend, such as other users’ emails.

 

However, the new policy acknowledges that claiming to be conducting security research is not a free pass for those acting in bad faith. For example, discovering vulnerabilities in devices in order to extort their owners, even if claimed as “research,” is not in good faith. The policy advises prosecutors to consult with the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) about specific applications of this factor.

 

All federal prosecutors who wish to charge cases under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act are required to follow the new policy, and to consult with CCIPS before bringing any charges. Prosecutors must inform the Deputy Attorney General (DAG), and in some cases receive approval from the DAG, before charging a CFAA case if CCIPS recommends against it.

 

https://twitter.com/UndeadFoia/status/1527314287575724034?s=20&t=E_zfAHdpqN14yTdN2gTP9w