>YOU DICKHEADS SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO ROLL
Roll what, foreskins? You are obsessed with glans, friend. In an unhealthy and unappealing manner.
>YOU DICKHEADS SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO ROLL
Roll what, foreskins? You are obsessed with glans, friend. In an unhealthy and unappealing manner.
>you are not supposed to feed the guns MREs.
Have you never faced the five fingers of death?
Is there a precedent or ruling that establishes that US citizens are subject to military tribunal in those circumstances, Anon? Not being argumentative, just seeking a substantive reason to be supportive. I can see that if it can be established that civil courts are unreliable, coerced, usurped, or infiltrated, then military tribunals are called for. However, what is the case if civil courts are functioning?
>Well, they can be.
I'm hopeful, but an opinion by a candidate in a confirmation hearing expressed in a reply to a possibly compromised US Senator is not a legal precedent and has no bearing upon the court.
Oz knows. Others will learn.
>The next weeks/months will be interesting.
A potentially disfiguring pox is the perfect scare weapon in the social environment [they] have created. How best to ensure compliance than in a vain video, digital photo, tik-tok, Instagram, social media, image-conscious society?