"We are recycling our own bullshit of:
'[No name] just made a startling public accusation against Trump and phony Nunes memo release'
By putting that disinformation in bot form, then we'll reference the bots as justification.
Anons can we invent a new term for a bot form of wrap up smear?
Pointer error of referencing a reference (post bot text, then referencing bot text) but never instantiate any object (Nunes memo is IN FACT 'phony') and then pretend that referencing a reference to a null value is itself the object being referenced.
Like that Biden admin moron at the WH press briefing who 'referenced' Russia false flags at the Ukraine border, and after being queried by that AP reporter for the actual information object being referenced, the moron referenced the reference and said "I just gave it to you that's the proof".
Anon thinking about a term to describe a double null pointer exception, of referencing null, then referencing the reference to the null as if that 'negating the negating' of the concept of object is somehow itself an instance of the object being referenced.
First, reference the null.
Then, negate that 'reference to null' and add another reference layer, referencing the reference, looping through that iteration to avoid actually having to identify or provide any object instance to which the entire chain of references depends.
What's the term for when a person does this KNOWINGLY?
Reference a null, then blast references to the same null by creating a whole bunch of references (echoes) to the reference to the null, and when asked to provide the instance referenced, the dialectic logic of negation is used to negate that engagement and then make a new reference to that, and on and on, looping references without any underlying instance.
Digital wrap up smear…
Referencing references to nulls.