at the highest levels, how do security clearances get issued? wouldn't the issuing body/reviewer need to know the content to which the security level to be given was at?

In martial arts, as example, you are tested/screened to and through a higher level rank by an individual or collective who are at or above that rank.

So do algorithms process security clearance ratings, AI, or people? And if people, how would they know what they were clearing the applicant for, if they were any less of a security clearance rank?

Fed contractors like Gates, Bezos, Musk, Theil, Cook, Ellison, etc would all have clearances related to DOD databases, Cloud services, AI, logistic, nanotech, and satellite tech etc…

Supposedly Q clearance at DOE is a top level as well. So too would be the head of the USPTO. Who, what group, or system arrives at the decision as to who can be cleared to what, and wouldn't they necessarily also have to know what the 'what' is?

>>16319419

>>16319413

still unclear as to how someone or committee can grant access to a level they themselves have no access to.

Back to martial arts example, a white belt cannot evaluate the candidacy of a practitioner aspiring for black belt.

At the highest levels,, who and how are sec clearances granted.

And what about inventers/experimenters/visionaries who stumble upon something or some new innovation or invention that all previously similar work was deemed classified to a specific high level. Who knows that, and how is that new individual and his work then dealt with,, cleared, and classified?

>>16319544

its funny when clowns try to insult but reveal their true tendencies. ty for the laugh medicine. Kek!

>>16319572

everything