Anonymous ID: 331290 May 22, 2022, 6:40 a.m. No.16321426   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1445 >>1446 >>1453

>>16321360

>>16321376

>>16321383

>>16321408

 

It doesn't / can't happen over night if you're average. What's the median salary…? median home price? What if she wants Whole Foods instead of Wal Mart? What if the kids wanna play team sports? (yeah, it's open to them as homeschoolers, but there's less money floating around the house to pay for fees…there are always fees).

 

It's a good prompting thought, but not everyone has an easy path in front of them and chastising only make the one who is feeling bad feel worse.

 

Patience obi-wan.

Anonymous ID: 331290 May 22, 2022, 6:58 a.m. No.16321482   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1542 >>1612 >>1805

Email from John Deutch of MIT w/cc to John Podesta about nuclear initiatives.

Attachment in email cites work by Sam Briton now working at DOE.

Deutch had his clearance suspended in 1999 for working on classified material on his home computer - https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/aug99/deutch21.htm

 

Excerpt from bio:

"John Deutch has served in significant government and academic posts throughout his career. In May 1995, he was sworn in as Director of Central Intelligence following a unanimous vote in the Senate, and served as DCI until December 1996."

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/682

 

……………………… ………………….. …………………………………….. ……………………………..

From:jmd@mit.edu

To: Brian_C_Deese@who.eop.gov

CC: john.podesta@gmail.com, Monizej@hq.doe.gov

Date: 2015-06-06 20:56

Subject: Be Careful

 

To Brian Deese,

 

I am informed that John Holdren is hosting a meeting on advanced nuclear

technology in the WH on June 15. This meeting to hear from an industry group,

“The Third Way” who are advocating an advanced nuclear technology and are

seeking the DOE to fund an “advanced nuclear test center.”

 

Here is what I told a friend (from the real world) about caution with this approach.

 

Best regard, John .

 

____

I believe this approach is deeply wrong. The greatest lesson from

large scale new technology demonstration projects is to spend a lot

of up front time analyzing the schedule, cost, and milestones of an

integrated project development. In the case nuclear power history shows

and common sense confirms that each technology option involves a

project time line on the order of a decade, a cost on the order of $10 billion,

and a very demanding up front regulatory process involving several years

and a couple of billion dollars.

 

Clearly the private sector is not going to undertake such projects - especially given

the low cost of natural gas. Equally clearly the federal government cannot afford

to pay for even a small fraction of the interesting new reactor concepts that are

around.

 

A nuclear innovation test center (at what cost) might cut the project development

time and cost of each of the many competing fission/fusion alternatives. But,

no estimate is offered of how much such a center might cost and how many

projects would need to be pursued to justify it.

 

In sum, too little analysis of the prospects and costs of the advanced nuclear fusion

alternatives and too little analysis of the leverage that might be realized from a

advanced nuclear test center.

 

The federal resources available for energy RD&D are limited. Do you want to

spend billions here or somewhere else. The U.S. certainly cannot afford to

pursue “all the above.”

 

John Deutch

 

****

John Deutch

Department of Chemistry

Room 6-215

MIT

Cambridge MA 02139

 

e-mail jmd@mit.edu<mailto:jmd@mit.edu>

Tel: 617 253 1479

Fax: 617 258 5700

……………………… ………………….. …………………………………….. ……………………………..

Bio

http://web.mit.edu/chemistry/deutch/biography.html

Anonymous ID: 331290 May 22, 2022, 7:09 a.m. No.16321529   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1543

>>16321508

>Yea, he wouldn't last long in a federal prison

 

Kek, you think he'd make it to prison…

 

This is dead man walking as far as i can tell.

 

He spilled the beans, and there's more he's aware of….on other topics. Somebody is either going to do it, or stage it….just my guess.

Anonymous ID: 331290 May 22, 2022, 8:14 a.m. No.16321805   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16321482

 

>>16321542

>drivel

 

Yes…and just think, this dipshit gets paid.

 

>>16321612

>TY

My pleasure….mook has me trolling through podesta leaks again…i know them pretty well, but when I saw Sam Briton, my head flipped.

 

He's literally been groomed for his role at DOE.

And this Deutch character, holy shit. DS Operative Tenet shut his clearance down…that's a long ass time ago. Now, maybe it got reinstated somewhere along the line, but the guy is obviously plugged in to some extent and I have no doubt Briton wound up at DOE under Deutch's nod.

Anonymous ID: 331290 May 22, 2022, 8:21 a.m. No.16321838   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1849

>>16321822

I get sh*t like this on qalerts as well…I don't usually search terms, but times and dates. I'm not sure if there is something in the background that the search functions are pulling (like a response to the drop or the drop being a response to something else).