Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 6:37 a.m. No.16326346   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6720

#HunterBiden Attorney says feds subpoenaed paternity records, tax returns. Line of questioning tracks with separate 2019 subpoena from US Attorney Delaware for Hunter, James Biden records + two business partners dating back to 2014, when Joe Biden was VP.

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1528727085342150659

Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 6:59 a.m. No.16326443   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6483 >>6719 >>6720 >>6733

NSBA letter drafts called for National Guard and military to be deployed

 

Early demands from the National School Boards Association to the White House included calling for the deployment of the Army National Guard and the military police to monitor school board meetings, according to an early draft letter the organization's independent review released Friday.

 

In contrast to the final version, the draft of the NSBA letter said, "We ask that the Army National Guard and its Military Police be deployed to certain school districts and related events where students and school personnel have been subjected to acts and threats of violence."

 

The NSBA had originally sent a letter to President Biden in September 2021 that asked for parents protesting at school board meetings to be federally looked into, saying school officials were facing threats and violence at meetings. Most significantly the NSBA requested in its original letter that parents' actions should be examined under the Patriot Act as "domestic terrorists."

 

Then, on Oct. 4, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memorandum instructing the FBI to collaborate with state and local leaders to address "threats against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff." He went on to say that this collaboration "will open dedicated lines of communication for threat reporting, assessment, and response."

 

SAUCE: https://www.foxnews.com/media/nsba-letter-called-national-guard-military-deployed

Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 7:07 a.m. No.16326472   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

In a dispute over arbitration rights, the Supreme Court unanimously sides with a Taco Bell worker who sued the franchise owner for wage violations. The dispute involved whether the company waited too long to try to move the lawsuit out of court and into arbitration.

https://mobile.twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1528738195571191811

Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 7:17 a.m. No.16326507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6516 >>6522 >>6720

he Supreme Court rules 6-3 against two men on Arizona's death row who say they received ineffective assistance of counsel in state court. SCOTUS says that federal courts reviewing their cases can't hold evidentiary hearings to fully assess their ineffective-counsel claims.

https://mobile.twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1528740991422939136

Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 7:42 a.m. No.16326607   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

David Martinez Ramirez and Barry Lee Jones

These two men got the death penalty, and the SCOTUS ruled on their cases.

The usual suspects are screeching about muh death row.

Time for anons to dig and find out what they caught the death penalty for

Especially if you're gonna try and debate people about it.

Anonymous ID: bcfb76 May 23, 2022, 8 a.m. No.16326676   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6719 >>6720 >>6733

These are the two men that the SCOTUS ruled on today, they both committed acts of murder which they caught the death penalty for.

 

Innocence Fears Raised in High-Court Case Claiming Bad Lawyering

 

Two men sitting on Arizonaโ€™s death row say they face execution because they had bad lawyers.

 

On Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether theyโ€™re allowed to prove it.

 

David Martinez Ramirez and Barry Jones were convicted of murder and sentenced to death in separate state-court cases. Arizona officials say the pair had the chance to raise ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims in state postconviction proceedings, so theyโ€™re bound by the state-court record and canโ€™t develop new evidence on federal habeas review. The defendants point out their state postconviction lawyers were ineffective, too, so federal habeas review is the only way to develop their claims.

 

How the justices resolve the dispute will determine whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is vindicated in cases across the country and, for Jones and others who maintain their innocence, whether people whose guilt is in doubt are incarcerated or even executed.

 

โ€œItโ€™s easy to get lost in procedure and technicalities but this case is very much about whether innocent people will be able to present evidence of their innocence to a court,โ€ said Imran Syed, co-director of the Michigan Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School. Heโ€™s also amicus-brief committee co-chair for the Innocence Network, which filed a brief in support of Ramirez and Jones.

 

SAUCE: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/innocence-fears-raised-in-high-court-case-claiming-bad-lawyering