I enrolled in a subscription of Epoch Times and they give this free bookand other goodies. If you sign up for a year, you can invite a friend for free also, thought anons might want this book. I'm leaving it open in the browser, I don't know if you'll be able to download it but give it a try.
https://cdn.epoch.cloud/books/How_the_Specter_of_Communism_Is_Ruling_Our_World.pdf
Anons, I thought the something similar to Carlson's article when Priestap came up early on, when I researched on him, his history was shadowy, not extensive bio on Wiki and seemed like gaps in his life. Also Stzrock and Page did not like him they thought he was a busy body. Excellent long article from Jeff Carlson.
Is Bill Priestap a White Hat & UDP FBI Surveillance
April 18, 2018 by Jeff Carlson, CFA
On April 17, 2018, the FBI announced that Terry J. Albury, a former Special Agent of the FBI, pleaded guilty in connection with his unauthorized disclosure and retention of classified national defense information.
There were two interesting components to this announcement:
What Albury illegally disclosed – along with potential ramifications.
Who made the announcement.
Albury gave information – classified at the Secret level – about the agency’s methods for conducting surveillance on political, religious and minority groups to a reporter. This included an unredacted copy of the agency’s Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide.
Albury is accused of being the source for an investigative project by The Intercept titled The FBI’s Secret Rules:
The FBI can in certain circumstances bypass its own rules in order to send undercover agents or informants into political and religious organizations, as well as schools, clubs, and businesses.
For instance, none of the rules apply if a foreign government operates the organization, or if the FBI “reasonably” believes the organization to be acting on behalf of a foreign power, so long as its U.S.-based members are mostly foreigners.
And the rules only apply to groups the FBI deems “legitimate.”
The redacted definition of a “legitimate” group is one “formed for lawful purposes” and whose “activities are primarily lawful.” This would exclude obvious criminal networks but could also exclude activist groups if an agent decides that their “primary purpose” is to hold protests involving unlawful acts.
Some of the instances granting exclusions to the FBI are similar to those applied to FISA Title I and Title III Surveillance.
FISA Title I and III provisions relate to the conduct of electronic surveillance and physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes of persons, facilities, or property inside the United States….
• But Priestap would be a pretty solid number two.
• Priestap would have been privy to most everything Comey, McCabe, Baker, Strzok and Page were engaged in.
• Perhaps Priestap got nervous in the early stages and sought a friendly – and safe – way out.
• But to have remained in his current position it would have needed to be really early stage – before his hands got too dirty.
• Maybe he was never truly a part of the Comey/McCabe inside group.
• His numerous interactions, inclusions on emails and text references suggest otherwise.
• Or, Priestap was operating as a White Hat from the beginning.
• We don’t know anything with certainty but I’m finding Priestap’s continued tenure as Counterintelligence Head a bit…suspicious.
• An active and covert role against actions by the Comey/McCabe Group seems a likely explanation to me.
https://themarketswork.com/2018/04/18/is-bill-priestap-a-white-hat-udp-fbi-surveillance/
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1528767828651872256?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
Since Priestap is up today in Sussmann trial you may want to review the articles on him. Jeff Carlson wrote a number of articles on Priestap at that time, they are all interesting and refreshing to my memory
https://themarketswork.com/2018/02/12/john-brennan-james-clapper-complicity-lies-bill-priestap/
https://themarketswork.com/2017/12/28/where-is-bill-priestap-fbis-counter-intelligence-head/
Margot recommends the best person to follow on Truth Social for the Sussmann trial
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1528757461146017792?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
blow by blow
https://twitter.com/AGoudsward/status/1528774285778726912?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
first and 2nd part of Priestap
https://twitter.com/AGoudsward/status/1528735915610411017?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
Of all the media outlets the Houston Chronicle, tries to shovel this shit to Texans & the US. Must be getting a big subsidy from Bidan Admin.Look at the excuses they are using it's not Bidan's fault.
Holy Shit, hardly ever positive articles on Trump's accomplishments and these people are trying to uphold Bidan as successful….I get it, I just hate it.
https://twitter.com/laurahollis61/status/1528691010288721920?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
https://twitter.com/mexillentJunior/status/1526631535348224002?s=20&t=SsY0ETD3EYZju3hGdi2Eiw
The NYT's guy I posted seemed to miss some important parts and made it seem like Priestap was hostile… This guy is more objective, I think.
John Haughey@JFHaughey58·2h
Under cross-examination, Priestap said he “does not recall”why internal FBI chat messages said “people on the 7th floor (leadership) are fired up” about the allegations or why agents wrote he said they had “no choice” but to open an investigation. #SussmannTrial
https://twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1528744975806173185?s=20&t=f25w_pBiUMmIm5UnBWTEkg
>>16327077 FBI official struggles to recall key details in Sussmann case, dealing blow to prosecution
that pretty much settles it, Priestap is not a WH, he was so unprepared for this, was he a hostile witness?