Get a NEW BOARD
(if it actually matters)!
thats exactly how it reads to me anon
>Y'all think he is talking about here?
after the fiasco over his ReTruth of a conversation thread that had Q drops as the OP yeasteday
yeah
I am thinking so
>The if it matters is the curveball part.
correct
and I think the "dual" context works both ways
WSJ needs a new editorial board
…if is even matters
-ergo, WSJ is a failed/irrelevant publication now, so would it even matter if they cleaned house
on the chan board side
I am taking it as
comms platform is going to move to Truth Social
its PDJT's baby, so this isnt really a surprise
(We) need a new board if we want to play the same game of being his "sounding board" like we did in the chan/twitter days
but, we dont NEED the chan as an open forum anymore, because Truth Social isnt going to have the limitations of Twitter that required the chan boards to get around
he is still down to run comms to the chan's
but it isnt going to be required like it was before
and it wont work at ALL on this board anymore
vis-a-vis current management
>MAKE THE TRUMP COMMS NOTABLE IN /QR/
kek
the fact that its like pulling teeth to get @45 comms noted
>No one has responded to the idea of having a section for hot topics
well there were multiple mentions for aTRUMPsection
/shrug/
some kind of semi-persistnant notable section would be useful for things that remain notable for many many breads