>>1632906 <<

"should be done in a week or two"

>>1633070

...april 20?

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)

Cohen raid by FBI?

Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?

SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?

RR signed off?

What other docs were collected?

How many places raided?

Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?

Think logically.

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

Who has everything?

Methods which info collected/ obtained?

Admissible in the court of law?

Insert Rudy.

First public statement.

“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html

Think resignations.

Who has the POWER?

If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?

Why are we here?

Public forum.

World watching.

Sharing of intel to bad actors?

Purpose?

Not confirming SC is on /team/.

Question everything.

Timing important.

Planned?

Q

>>1633112

>engage your brian

>>1633135

i know the feeling… i don't try and lock Q down anymore: what goes in goes in, what's hazy and vague remains that way, until something new can shed a new light on it, or a re-reading later…

reading it now, seems to me a lot of what Q's talking about in that post is about how that info is shared to us, and to them at the same time: as we just struggle to piece together the plan, they are more likely to take action and make mistakes, etc… frustrating for us, but a whole other game for them

>>1633343 nah, well worth the kek… glad it went to an anon clearly not fishing for it

>>1633743

pass around a get-well card for FLOTUS, too

>>1633807

kek

nice find