Anonymous ID: 5e36bb May 23, 2022, 8:16 p.m. No.16330471   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0487 >>0532 >>0547 >>0587 >>0588 >>0589

Anon posted this article and the info twice today, please pay attention, don't forget that face

its a deep dive into how they are destroying us by the fake, phony, false disinfo label >>329026PB

Busted: Disinformation Operative Who Attacked Elon Musk’s Push for “Free Speech” Caught Red-Handed in Secret InfluenceOperationMay 23, 2022 REVOLVER

 

It is not yet clear whether Elon Musk’s increasingly precarious play for Twitter will result in the restoration of free speech in the “global public square.” Successful or not, Elon’s brave move has clarified beyond any doubt the Regime’s fundamental hostility to free speech and dissent. Judging from the critical reactions from journalists, NGOs and Democrat politicians, you’d think the man were attempting to invade Poland rather than remove censorship on a social media platform.

 

Of all the regime scribblers and scribes flooding the internet with glorified blog posts on the awfulness of Elon Musk’s Twitter bid, apiece by Renée DiRestapublished in the Atlantic stands out from the rest — not because of its force of argument, but because of the largely forgotten scandal behind its author.

 

Like the now disgraced and jobless Nina Jankowicz,DiResta is a career-girl of the Disinformation Industry— a constellation of NATO and US State Department-funded NGOs and civil society groups that censor inconvenient truths, facts and narratives under the guise of protecting the public from so-called “disinformation.” And like Nina Jankowicz, it turns out that DiResta’s name is closely associated with one of the most explosive and aggressively covered-up influence operations of the century.

 

Tellingly, in an earlier (and less guarded) piece for the Atlantic, DiResta not only encourages narrative-level political censorship on social media, she also claims that there is no political bias to social media censorship practices. DiResta insists that since misinformation overwhelmingly comes from the political right, this gives the false appearance that social media companies are biased against the right when they censor misinformation. Read the following passage and behold the twisted logic of a modern day commissar (emphasis ours):

 

The distinct behavior of serial spreaders of misinformation should theoretically make them easy for Facebook or Twitter to identify. Platforms that place warning labels on false or misleading content could penalize accounts that repeatedly create it; after an account earned a certain number of strikes, the platform’s algorithms could suspend it or limit users’ ability to share its posts. But platforms also want to appear politically neutral. Inconveniently for them, our research found that although some election-related misinformation circulated on the left, the pattern of the same accounts repeatedly spreading false or misleading claims about voting, or about the legitimacy of the election itself, occurred almost exclusively among pro-Trump influencers, QAnon boosters, and other outlets on the right. We were not the only ones to observe this; researchers at Harvard described the former president and the right-wing media as driving a “disinformation campaign” around mail-in voter fraud during the 2020 election; the researchers’ prior work had meticulously detailed a “propaganda feedback loop” within the closely linked right-wing media ecosystem.

 

In this piece we see reference to the same narratives, election integrity and Covid skepticism, that DiResta previously lumped in with ISIS and terrorism, perpetrated by vaguely defined alleged malefactors like “QAnon boosters” (whatever that is) and, Heaven forfend, “pro-Trump influencers.” DiResta backs up her shocking claim, that misinformation is essentially a right-wing problem, with a Harvard study. Without wasting too much of our time on it, we dug up the specific Harvard study DiResta references.

 

Voter Fraud: Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign” Despite Ambassador Dan Fried’s performative condemnation of DiResta’s Alabama operation, he saw fit to approvingly cite her as an authority in his 2020 publication (co-authored with Alina Polakova) “Democratic Offense Against Disinformation.”

 

Perhaps even more remarkable is the fact that DiResta’s work is cited in an official Department of Homeland Security memo on “combatting targeted disinformation campaigns.”…

 

https://www.revolver.news/2022/05/busted-disinformation-operative-renee-diresta-integrity-initiative-free-speech-elon-musk-george-soros/

 

DiResta wrote this book at Harvard

 

=COMPUTATIONAL PROPAGANDA: IF YOU MAKE IT TREND, YOU MAKE IT TRUE==

 

Her whole goal is propaganda to make people disbelieve the truth

 

Read the long Revolver Article, mind blowing and indepth

 

https://www.revolver.news/2022/05/busted-disinformation-operative-renee-diresta-integrity-initiative-free-speech-elon-musk-george-soros/

Anonymous ID: 5e36bb May 23, 2022, 8:20 p.m. No.16330486   🗄️.is đź”—kun

DiResta wrote this book at Harvard

 

COMPUTATIONAL PROPAGANDA: IF YOU MAKE IT TREND, YOU MAKE IT TRUE

 

Her whole goal is propaganda to make people disbelieve the truth

 

Read the long Revolver Article, mind blowing and in depth

 

THEY HAVE BEEN PLANNING THIS FOR MANY YEARS