Sussmann case witness said Trump-Russia research made him ‘uncomfortable'

| May 24, 2022 11:03 PMPart 1 of 2

A former business associate of Rodney Joffe launched a Trump-Russia data-mining project in 2016 at the direction of the technology executive, a task the witness said made him feel “extremely uncomfortable” because it felt like “opposition research.”

Jared Novick, formerly the CEO of BitVoyant in 2016, provided new details about Joffe, known as “Technology Executive-1” in special counsel John Durham’s indictment of Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, and about Joffe’s efforts to use his perch in the cybersecurity world to snoop on associates of then-candidate Donald Trump.

Novick said he dubbed the Joffe-directed project “Crimson Rhino” because the “last thing I wanted was Donald Trump’s name” displayed around the office.

Sussmann has been charged with concealing his two clients, former Neustar chief technology officer Joffe and Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, from FBI General Counsel James Baker when he pushed debunked allegations of a secret line of communication between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa-Bank during a September 2016 meeting.

Novick said in August 2016 that Joffe "called me asking to look at research and data related to Donald Trump and Russia.” He added, “It was extremely uncommon. It was unique. We never before did any tasking like this. … This was a tasking about an individual or a group of individuals.”

Novick said the fact that it was about Trump meant it “felt very political” and that “the whole thing felt like opposition research,” but he reluctantly proceeded with the task.

He said Joffe had sent him a nondescript PDF document with the names of five to seven individuals, along with personal data. He called this a “tasking document” on “associates of Donald Trump and Russian entities” and said it included a sentence or two on each individual, their activities, and the names of Russian companies and alleged Russian affiliations. He said he immediately "knew it was a political request.”

Novick said Trump campaign associate Carter Page was listed. He also said he saw the name of Richard Burt, saying the paper alleged a connection to Alfa-Bank.

British ex-spy Christopher Steele is best known for his discredited anti-Trump dossier, which Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded played a "central and essential" role in the FBI's flawed effort to obtain wiretap orders against Page.

Steele created his dossier after being hired by Fusion GPS, which was itself hired by Perkins Coie and Marc Elias, the general counsel for Clinton’s campaign. Sussmann worked for Perkins at the time too, and both he and Elias met with Steele in 2016.

Novick said he put together a research team of three people and said the plan was to “hopefully do it quickly and get rid of it.”

Novick said he co-founded BitVoyant (which was eventually bought by BlueVoyant) in 2015 and that the company was founded with support and direction fromLittoral Ventures, whose leaders were Joffe, Victor Oppelman, and Raymond Saulino. Novick said Joffe was also associated with Packet Forensics and Zetalytics, whose chief data scientist was April Lorenzen.

He said he was the CEO of BitVoyant in 2016, where he worked alongside researchers and analysts who were good with data. He said he had roughly 10 employees, and he reported to Littoral Ventures and the board — Joffe, Oppelman, and Saulino.

The prosecution showed an email Novick sent to Packet Forensics on Aug. 15, 2016, in a message copied to Joffe and Oppelman, saying, “Please find our requests attached. We cast a large net based on our initial analysis pass. 1. Files named ‘Deep’ are special requests where we want specific increased details (if possible) 2. Files named ‘Wide’ are meant to cover the breadth of potential analysis (relationship discovery).”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/sussmann-case-witness-said-trump-russia-research-made-him-uncomfortable

>>16337797

I wonder how many contractors like Joffe the federal government still has under contract? Who leaked POTUS’s phone calls with World Leaders?

Part 2 of 2

He compared his company’s normal operations to asatellite company that does flood plain analysis for a large areabut said Joffe’s tasking was similar to focusing a satellite on someone’s backyard in the hopes of finding something related to Trump and Alfa-Bank.

Novick said his team wrote the report, and “the report went to Rodney Joffe because he tasked me.”

The judge presiding over the case against Sussmann ruled last week that the prosecution cannot bring up the fact Joffe had been cut off as a confidential human source in 2021, in part because of the Durham investigation.

Defense attorney Sean Berkowitz tried to get Novick to say Joffe was highly respected in the cyber community, but the witness replied, “I think he was respected by some and not by others.”

When Berkowitz asked him about Joffe having large contracts with the U.S. government, Novick countered, “I do know that some government agencies were suspicious of Rodney.”

Novick told the defense that similar projects were being conducted by his small team, Lorenzen and Zetalytics, certain individuals at Packet Forensics, and Joffe. He said Joffe sent him “additional analysis” that his researchers didn’t support.

The defense tried to highlight his disdain for Joffe, and Novick spoke about the “challenging time with Rodney.”

Berkowitz accused him of not actually getting the tasking document from Joffe, but Novick repeated that he did.

Durham prosecutor Jonathan Algor asked Novick if he knew where the results of the project were ultimately being sent, and the witness replied, “It was to go to an attorney with ties to,” but the defense team cut him off and objected, and the judge sustained the objection.

Durham revealed this year that he had evidence Joffe “exploited” domain name system internet traffic at Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President.

The special counsel said Joffe also tasked researchers with mining internet data to establish “an inference” and “narrative” tying Trump to Russia. Durham said Joffe indicated he was doing this to please certain “VIPs” on the Clinton campaign.

The jury has not been able to see much of this evidence.

Joffe said in April he would be invoking his Fifth Amendment rights in the Sussmann case.

Steve de Jong, an employee at Neustar, testified last week about how Joffe “asked me to as a favor run a query over our DNS data logs to see if we saw any queries related to political campaigns and presidential elections.” He added that "in retrospect, it was mostly around the Trump campaign.”

A Durham prosecutor has said the special counsel's team is still "looking closely" at Joffe, including pointing to alaw on major fraud against the U.S. government, specifically mentioning a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency contract.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/sussmann-case-witness-said-trump-russia-research-made-him-uncomfortable

Refresher

Emails Show Researchers Who Alleged Trump Links To Russian Alfa Bank Were Anti-Trump

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

PART 1 OF 3

“Do the f-cking alfa bank secret comms story, it is hugely important,” Fusion GPS’s Peter Fritsch pushed a media contact in the final weeks before the November 2016 general election, according to emails obtained by an open records request. “Call David Dagon at Georgia tech,” Fritsch would then insist when the Reuters News investigative reporter countered that the problem with the story was an inability to authenticate the data.

While Dagon may have been an expert in the data crunching, emails recently obtained by The Federalist from Georgia Tech reveal Dagon was something more—he was an anti-Trump, Russia-collusion conspiracy theorist.

Dagon’s name first became connected with the Alfa Bank story when Special Counsel John Durham indicted Michael Sussmann two months ago, charging the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer with lying to FBI General Counsel James Baker.

What the Indictment Says about the Alfa Bank Story

According to the indictment, when Sussmann met with Baker on September 19, 2016, and provided the top FBI lawyer with “white papers” and data files purporting to establish a secret communications channel between the Trump organization and the now famous Russia-connected Alfa Bank, Sussmann falsely claimed he was not there on behalf of a client. In truth, though, Sussmann was working both for the Clinton campaign and an unnamed “U.S. technology industry executive,” the indictment charged.

The 27-page speaking indictment then detailed the origins of the Alfa Bank story. In July 2016, a computer researcher, using the moniker “Tea Leaves” and referred to in the Sussmann indictment as “Originator-1,” “had assembled purported DNS data reflecting apparent DNS lookups between Russian Bank-1 and an email domain, ‘mail1.trump-email.com.” “Tea Leaves,” a business associate of Tech-Executive 1, shared her information with Tech-Executive 1 and others, with Tech-Executive 1 alerting Sussmann to the data.

According to the indictment, Tech Executive-1 later “exploited his access to non-public data at multiple Internet companies to conduct opposition research concerning Trump,” and enlisted “the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

The indictment further alleged that in early August 2016, “Tech Executive-1 directed and caused employees of two companies in which he had an ownership interest,” “to search and analyze their holdings of public and non-public internet data for derogatory information on Trump.” He also “tasked originator-1 and two computer researchers (‘Researcher-1’ and ‘Research-2’) who worked at a U.S.-based university (‘University-1’) to search broadly through Internet data for any information about Trump’s potential ties to Russia.” Among the data searched, the indictment alleged, was data Tech-Executive 1 had provided to Originator-1, Researcher-1, and Researcher-2.

Tech Executive 1 had provided the researchers access to that data to allow them to establish “proof of concept” for work they were seeking to perform under a government contract, which was eventually awarded in November 2016. Some of the data the university accessed from Tech-Executive 1’s internet company during this “proof of concept” stage included data the company had access to because it was a “sub-contractor in a sensitive relationship between the U.S. government and another company.”

While the data was provided to allow the researchers to protect U.S. networks from cyberattacks, according to the indictment, Originator-1, Researcher-1, and Researcher 2 also exploited the “data to assist Tech Executive-1 in his efforts to conduct research concerning Trump’s potential ties to Russia,” including the allegations about the secret communication channel between Trump’s organizations and Alfa Bank.

The Unnamed Players Go Public

Within hours of the indictment dropping in mid-September, internet sleuths began postulating on the likely names behind the numbering. By month’s end, the players went public, lawyers in hand.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/17/emails-show-researchers-who-alleged-trump-links-to-russian-alfa-bank-were-anti-trump/

Emails Show Researchers…

Part 2 of 3

The attorney for Manos Antonakakis, Mark Schamel, told The New York Times that his client, the unnamed “Researcher-1” and a computer scientist at Georgia Tech, had “provided feedback on an early draft of data that was cause for additional investigation.” Their hypothesis, “to this day, remains a plausible working theory,” Schamel, claimed.

Lawyers for Dagon confirmed to The New York Times that he was the second Georgia Tech data scientist discussed in the indictment. Dagon’s attorneys were more positive in their rejoinder, telling the Times the Alfa Bank results “have been validated and are reproducible. The findings of the researchers were true then and remain true today; reports that these findings were innocuous or a hoax are simply wrong.”

“Originator-1” is April Lorenzen, her attorney, Michael J. Connolly, confirmed. Lorenzen, the chief data scientist for Zetalytics, has “dedicated her life to the critical work of thwarting dangerous cyberattacks on our country,” Connolly intoned, adding: “Any suggestion that she engaged in wrongdoing is unequivocally false.”

And then there’s the man behind the mission: Tech Executive-1, identified as Rodney Joffe. Joffe’s lawyer, Steven A. Tyrrell, told the Times “his client had a duty to share the information with the F.B.I. and that the indictment “gratuitously presents an incomplete and misleading picture” of his role.

Emails obtained via an open records request to Georgia Tech, however, provide a picture of the politics behind the players who formulated and fed the Alfa Bank theory to Sussman, who in turn peddled it to the FBI. Some of the emails showed Joffe, Antonakakis, Dagon, and Lorenzen, or some combination of the four, merely exchanging media links of anti-Trump articles related to Trump or his team and supposed Russia connections.

But after Trump’s victory and later inauguration, the vitriol and tinfoil hattery lived loudly within emails Dagon sent.

“The Russians are killing spies with knowledge of the dossier materials,” Dagon wrote to Antonakakis in late January, linking to an Inquisitr.com article reporting of the death of a former KGB chief who allegedly helped to compile the “golden showers” dossier on Trump. Dagon then said his guess was “the purged NSC will now say that Russia has given us great intel on ISIS, and that we should lift sanctions now that Russia is helping.” “All this to protect Trump from the dossier materials,” Dagon ended his tirade.

A few minutes later, Antonakakis replied, “What the f-ck is going on? Can you please explain why GOP is not doing something?” Dagon’s response could have been a parody, but it wasn’t:

While the politics of some random researchers are their concern, when they allegedly assisted Joffe, as the indictment indicates, that made it everyone’s business. It was Joffe, however, who handed off the data to Fusion GPS and Sussmann, and Sussmann who allegedly lied to FBI General Counsel Baker.

Further, unlike Joffe, who worked hand-in-hand with Sussmann, according to Fusion GPS employee Laura Seago, who had worked on the Alfa project, she was not aware of anyone at Fusion GPS communicating with either Dagon or Antonakakis. And while she had heard Dagon’s name before, Seago first came across Antonakakis’s name in a newspaper article.

Antonakakis has not had any contact with Sussman, Marc Elias, or Fusion GPS, his lawyer Mark Schamel told The Federalist. “In this case,” Schamel added, “he reviewed a narrative presented to him by a well-known and respected researcher and provided his feedback, as he does for more than 100 unpublished research articles he receives every year.” Attorneys representing Lorenzen and Dagon did not return requests for comment.

Allegedly Sharing Non-Public Internet Data

While the charge against Sussmann concerned his alleged lie to Baker over whether he was representing anyone in sharing the Alfa Bank intel, a larger issue raised in the indictment concerns Joffe’s alleged sharing of internet company data with the researchers.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/17/emails-show-researchers-who-alleged-trump-links-to-russian-alfa-bank-were-anti-trump/

>>16337851

Emails Show Researchers…

Part 3 of 3

Joffe “caused employees of two companies in which he had an ownership interest to search and analyze their holdings of public and non-public internet data,” the indictment charges. Also, according to the indictment, the data Georgia Tech accessed included the “DNS data of an Executive Branch of office of the U.S. government, which Internet Company-1 had come to possess as a sub-contractor in a sensitive relationship between the U.S. government and another company.”

While the purpose of providing Georgia Tech access to that data was to enable researchers “to protect U.S. networks from cyberattacks” from July 2016 through at least February 2017, the indictment alleged, Lorenzen, Antonakakis, and Dagon “also exploited Internet Company-1’s data and other data to assist Tech Executive-1 in his efforts to conduct research concerning Trump’s potential ties to Russia,” including the Alfa-Bank allegations that Sussmann later fed the FBI.

In one email dated July 31, 2016, Antonakakis wrote Joffe with a subject line of “one more data request.” That email and all of the others provided to The Federalist by Georgia Tech used Joffe’s Centergate.com email address. Notably, in this email Antonakakis quipped that he was not a Joffe customer yet, in an apparent reference to the fact that the government contract under which Georgia Tech would purchase services from Joffe’s internet company had not yet been awarded.

An individual at Neustar, Steve DeJong, who was not on the original email, replied three hours later in an email with the “one more data request” subject line, saying he received the request.

Whether these emails concerned the Alfa Bank project or the proof of concept project is unknown, and neither Neustar nor De Jong responded to requests for comment.

None of the other emails expressly discussed the Alfa Bank project either, but several were nonetheless suggestive, such as an email from Antonakakis to Lorenzen with Joffe CCed, dated August 20, 2116, with the regarding line saying “mta,” which likely means “message transfer agent” or “mail transfer agent,” which is an internet email system that transfers electronic mail from one computer to another.

In the text of that email, Antonakakis wrote: “The conclusion here is that there is no conclusion.” Hours later Joffe sent an email to Antonakakis, Dagon, and Lorenzen, with “fist analysis” as the subject, likely meaning “first analysis.” “F-ck,” followed by “<sigh>” was all he said.

While it is possible these exchanges concerned the proof of concept work the researchers needed to complete for the upcoming government contract, the timing of the emails fits the Sussmann indictment’s allegations.

“On or about August 19, 2016, Researcher-1 queried internet data maintained by Internet Company-1 for the aforementioned mail1.trump-email.com domain,” the indictment alleged, continuing: He “then emailed Tech Executive-1 and others a list of domains that had communicated with it—none of which appeared to have links to Russia.”

Another email shows Lorenzen, on August 21, 2021, emailing Antonakakis and Dagon about establishing a Github account to serve as “a private repository for keeping the list of domains in sync.” If this work concerned the government contract for proof of concept, Lorenzen’s suggestion for a Github account seems strange.

Neither Lorenzen nor Dagon’s attorneys responded to a request for comment, but Antonakakis’ attorney unequivocally stated that Antonakakis did not use a Github account.

Another question the documents did not answer concerned whether there were any restrictions placed on the Georgia Tech researchers during the pre-contract, “proof of concept stage.” The eventual contract Georgia Tech signed limited the access, use, or disclosure of government data, but according to the indictment, Joffe and his connected companies provided the researchers access to the various data they supposedly then “exploited.”

Here, then, really, are the questions needing answers: Did Joffe improperly provide Lorenzen, Dagon, or Antonakakis access to data? If so, did they know that? Or if the data shared was properly accessed, were there any restrictions on the use or publication of that data? If so, what were they?

Aside from Sussmann’s alleged lie to the FBI, this case may be nothing more than a further expose of how the liberal media feeds a false narrative to benefit its politics of choice—but that is bad enough by itself.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/17/emails-show-researchers-who-alleged-trump-links-to-russian-alfa-bank-were-anti-trump/

>>16337854

5 to 7 names Novick got from Joffe

New very long Techno Fog

How FBI HQ hamstrung the Alfa Bank investigation

The latest from the Michael Sussmann Trial

Techno Fog

Today in the Michael Sussmann trial, we received additional information regarding the FBI leadership’s involvement in the opening - and execution - of the Alfa Bank/Trump investigation. This included FBI Headquarters not approving an FBI agent’s repeated requests to interview the sources of the Alfa Bank “materials.”

But first we’ll start with the examination of Trisha Anderson.

Anderson is currently the Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel. Back in 2016, she was an FBI deputy general counsel and reported directly to then-FBI general counsel James Baker.

The purpose of her testimony was to prove-up her notes from a September 19, 2016 meeting she had with Baker, where Baker discussed his meeting with Michael Sussmann. (The notebook was necessary because Anderson didn’t recall the meeting itself.)

Anderson stated she knew of Sussmann prior to September 2016 but denied knowing he was an attorney for the DNC. In response, she was presented with an intersting e-mail discussing an FBI meeting with Sussmann, the DNC CEO, Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike, and another FBI official (Cyber Division’s James Trainor) to take place on June 16, 2016:

For reference, that meeting took place two days after the DNC announced on June 14, 2016 that it had been a victim of Russian hacking and over a month before the DCCC said it had been hacked by the Russians.

Curtis Heide

Back in September 2016, FBI Special Agent Curtis Heide was assigned to the Alfa Bank “investigation in a co-case-agent capacity.” His trainee, FBI Agent Allison Sands, was the lead investigator on the case. The case came from FBI Headquarters in DC - specifically from Joe Pientka. While Heide understood the Alfa Bank allegations came from an “anonymous source,” Heide never learned the identity of that source:

The Alfa Bank opening communication drafted by Heide said it was opened as a “Full Field Investigation.” He was “ordered” to open the investigation by FBI headquarters:

Pientka made clear that the opening of the investigation was demanded by the FBI’s 7th Floor - including Director Comey - at the behest of Bill Priestap.

This is the type of investigation, as Heide said, that “employs all of our resources.” As Agent Heide explained:

“In order to open a full field investigation, we would need specific and articulable facts that a threat to U.S. national security has occurred or there’s been a violation of federal law.”

This is in contrast to lower investigative levels - those for which the Alfa Bank allegations would be more appropriate - which “allows limited investigative techniques to see if an allegation or an investigation is warranted.”

As to some of the Alfa Bank allegations brought by Sussmann? ….

Edit: Last thoughts about the latest CHS. “He” was close with the Alfa Bank researchers. He had an agenda. He was interviewed by the Washington Post. He spoke with Hope Hicks. He seems to be in the media.

Is the CHS David Corn? A discussion:

Corn has an agenda and was close to those who spread the Alfa Bank hoax.

Corn was interviewed by the Washington Post on November 2, 2016. Today’s transcript, however, references an October 5, 2016 “Status update on Alfa-Bank case” where the CHS had potentially already been interviewed by the Washington Post. I say “potentially” because the FBI discussion isn’t entirely clear on the topic.

Corn spoke with Hope Hicks about the Alfa Bank issue: “In an email to Mother Jones, Hope Hicks, a Trump campaign spokeswoman, maintains, ‘The Trump Organization is not sending or receiving any communications from this email server. The Trump Organization has no communication or relationship with this entity or any Russian entity.’)” Reporting from the CHS mentions a call with Hicks - but does not rule out e-mails.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/how-fbi-hq-hamstrung-the-alfa-bank?s=w

>>16337603

Greg Rubini said

Durham, Sussmann Trial: much more than it seems. Criminal Conspiracy. (#1 of 3)

Article #1 of 3 on the Sussmann Trial

Greg Rubini. 13 hr ago

On May 16, the trial of Michael Sussmann has begun. We now have the transcripts of the first 5 days of the trial, and we can paint a picture on the case. For the Durham Team this is much more than just winning a conviction of Michael Sussmann for “lying to the FBI”.The Durham Team is using the Sussmann trial to introduce evidence on record to lay out the framework of a “Criminal Conspiracy”.

In the last seven days I have examined and analyzed hundreds of pages of witnesses testimony, and dozens of documents filed as evidence, and the pattern is absolutely clear.

The Durham Team lawyers themselves have used several times in their filings the terms “joint venture” and “coordinated effort”.

And what is a “joint venture” when it involves committing crimes?

A Criminal Conspiracy.

There is much more to be said about the Sussman Trial, and about the Criminal Conspiracy. The evidence presented by the Durham Team and the witnesses testimony is “overkill” to just indict Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI.

Besides: since the allegations about the Trump-Alfa Bank were bogus, they were a Fraud, aren’t Michael Sussmann, Rodney Joffe and their co-conspirators also guilty of “Conspiracy to Defraud the Government”?

This is article #1 of a series of 3 articles I am publishing on the Sussmann Trial.

The next articles will be published in the following days, reporting about the testimonies of Marc Elias, top lawyer of Perkins Coie, Robby Mook, campaign manager of the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign, Deborah Fine, Deputy General Counsel of the Hillary Clinton campaign, FBI Agent Ryan Gaynor, former CIA officers Mark Chadason and Kevin P.

https://gregrubini.substack.com/p/durham-sussmann-trial-01?s=r

>>16337988

I think once Sussmann is done and guilty, there will numerous people charged with a masdive criminal conspiracy…that wull taje a long time but POTUS will be back and things will get interesting because the purge of government will start

>>16337917

I live in GA, I invite real Anons & Americans to come to GA and clean it up, a lot of very good people working on 2020 and ongoing elections but the courts are corrupt

Anyone saying GA is great under Kemp disregard the massive drug and human trafficking trade here.

Plus they are using the same fucking machines in the primary and Nov election. There is a lot wrong here, but of youvonly like sports, I guess it great.

GA is the key to reversing 2020 fraud is my belief.

So come on down, but try to have a bit of s southern accent! Kek

>>16337913

All for a shithole country, Ukraine!

>>16337909

Holy shit, vegan spaced out violent Nazis, great combo. The cook will be the first one killed by Azovs

>>16337895

So true

>>16337886

Not overpopulated, poor city, state and federal road planning, how can you equate too many cars to too many people, when many have a driver in the car only. Faulty logic

For 5 years I've been banging the drums against the media sharing the faces and names of mass shooters. We know there's a contagion effect. The media gets clicks while giving these monsters notoriety which only spurs more shootings. We all agree it's wrong to do this. Enough.

https://twitter.com/KyleKashuv/status/1529320182040211456?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1529274770293940224?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

Hershel Walker knocked out his opponent in two seconds into the fight. Look at thr votes he got.

Erik Asshole Erickson said early on Walker will never win! Kek every time i listen to Erik I always think the opposite. He’s not conservative or Republican!

MTG won with Ultra MAGA crowd.

Evans, the last minute enforsement says in some polls its still a toss up!

Purdue didnt even try

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/2022-georgia-primary-election-results

https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1529257240716361730?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

Everything Bidan does causes more pain and suffering for America!

https://twitter.com/RandyRRQuaid/status/1529271565803786245?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

I have a lot to say on who’s responsible for this, but I’ll just post the truth here

https://twitter.com/ZubyMusic/status/1529214951541420033?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

>>16338120

Yeah hes a complete arrogant asshole and he spent his entire childhood growing up UAE, Saudi Arabia, so he’s always been owned by a foreign country

>>16338135. Sorry Dubai not Saudi Arabia,I cant believe they put him in Rush Limbaughs radio slot. Its disgusting, hes the opposite of Rush

Erick Erickson - Biography

Biography

Erickson was born in Jackson, Louisiana, moved to Dubai, United Arab Emirates when he was 5 and returned to Jackson when he was 15. Erickson attended the American School of Dubai, previously known as the Jumeirah American School. His father worked for Conoco Oil as an oil company production foreman. Erickson received a bachelor’s degree from Mercer University in Macon, Georgia, and a law degree from Mercer’s Walter F. George School of Law and is an inactive member in good standing of the State Bar of Georgia.

Erickson was elected November 6, 2007 to a four year term as a Republican member of the Macon, Georgia city council, He resigned his office on February 16, 2011, partway through his first term to pursue a job with WSB radio in Atlanta; the Macon Telegraph noted his poor attendance as a council member before his resignation. While he was in office, Macon police officers considered forming a union. To counter the formation of the labor union, Erickson urged that the police department be dissolved.

Erickson's "Morning Briefing" e-mails grew from 498 subscribers when they began in February 2009 to nearly 70,000 by January 2010. The analysis from one of Erickson's "Morning Briefing" emails, just after the November 2009 election, was posted on the website of Human Events, referred to on the website of The American Spectator, and by Rush Limbaugh, and "fueled discussion later that morning at two influential weekly meetings of D.C. conservatives", according to an article in the Washington Post. The Post added, "The ability of a single e-mail to shape a message illustrates the power of the conservative network." The article described Erickson as one of the American conservative movement's "key national players".

The Daily Telegraph of London put Erickson on its "List of Most Influential US Conservatives", giving him a rank of 69th most influential in 2007 and 65th in 2010. According to the 2007 newspaper article: "Erickson epitomises the new power of the internet. A small-government fiscal and social conservative based in the south, he taps into and influences the Republican 'base' that the GOP’s 2008 candidates are courting."

Erickson was noted for having written on Twitter about Supreme Court Justice David Souter: "The nation loses the only goat fucking child molester to ever serve on the Supreme Court in David Souter's retirement." In an appearance on the Colbert Report, Erickson said the Twitter statement was "not my finest hour". Erickson stated on his blog: "A while back, Glenn Beck called Barack Obama a 'racist.' Given all the terrorists, thugs, and racists Barack Obama has chosen as close personal friends (see e.g. Rev. Wright), it's not a stretch to say it."..

https://www.liquisearch.com/erick_erickson/biography

>>16338145

No its not just you, he’s an idiot held captive by Nazis and backed by Israel and Kolomoisky

>>16338155

It really is…they should have just replayed years and years of Rush

>>16338152

These type of things makes me believe these events are good for FBI business. Sick really

>>16338137

Maybe he’s already dead…if he dies when POTUS is back, no he wont

>>16338120

They really do, strange and fattys

>>16338064

We should all chip in and send her 1,000s of boxes of KFC, so she never stops eating

>>16338196

You mean, she continues to stress eat.

She lost the last election because massive debt, now the hog is worth $3 million

Its a leftie miracle

>>16338166

They were very big headed babies and fat bodies so their heads never went back to normal after coming out is my theory

Anons I had a bad feeling yesterday and I have an even worse feeling today, prayers up please

https://twitter.com/MWPolitics101/status/1529306710610944002?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

>>16338239

Would it hurt to just say some prayers, even if I’m wrong

https://twitter.com/MWPolitics101/status/1529306710610944002?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1529275895202160641?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

Doesn’t every school have an iff duty officer during the day? Did they have one, if not, why not?

https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1529267489238130688?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1529272306442330113?s=20&t=rWjVyHqkBm9R2e7ybr-8_g

>>16338274

I dont believe it! I barely thought it was real yesterday, didnt any other teachers etc come running? This fucking sucks

>>16338311

Kek