Anonymous ID: 4d6361 June 4, 2018, 5:46 p.m. No.1633980   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1633909

Q' not doing much responding to anything lately, and for that matter hasn't confirmed and/or denied every single thing that anons have theorized. So your point (why hasn't Daddy Q approved it?) is null & void.

Presuming most of us are adults. We should be at the point where we don't need Q's approval, we have the hive mind, and more importantly, our own minds to discern. LEARN is what Q told us to do. Trial and error, unless you have a better solution?

Anonymous ID: 4d6361 June 4, 2018, 6:10 p.m. No.1634205   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4256

>>1634180

?I'm not talking about the hour in real life, I'm talking about the hour on the Q-clock.

I know, same here. The correlation of minutes, ex. :58 here >>1634155, is a good match. I can't see where adding the hour hand would match up though. EST? Zulu time? Or something else completely.

tl;dr what would the hour hand count exactly, if it's added?

Anonymous ID: 4d6361 June 4, 2018, 6:47 p.m. No.1634585   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1634504

>When it comes to making predictions the clock has failed. However, when it comes to Q's posts lining up with the dates, timestamps and winding of the clock (as directed by Q posts), it fucking works perfectly.

Have to agree.

>Future proves past, not a predictor.

Agreed x10. Predictions & foreknowledge are very different things. We're given forknowledge, however Q has stated that he's

>Unpredictable.

as the plan must be fluid enough to encompass all moves & countermoves. Not necessarily predict exactly when event A or even B will happen.