He didn't, Q did.
There is no perhaps about it, Q put his name in position 1. t your lying eyes? And you expect others to go "oh yeah that sounds reasonable, we are all secretly in a secret matrix so anything is possible", or are you going to come back to reality?
>Oh shit, Trump's talking about a NEW BOARD. That's it, Trump removed from notables! Brush that shit awwwwaaayyyyyyy.
The Truman Show is a retelling of the Luciferian tale. Man struggles against the "demiurge" who controls his life capriciously, man makes himself free and leaves the fake existence. The hint that was really obvious was the Sirius light falling to the earth and almost landing on his head. The dog star. Naturally, beware the crafty Jews in Hollywood. They love Luciferian tales telling them over and over and over and over until you're inducted in a mystery religion factually.
Watch this and listen to the lyrics. It will tell you why and what they believe.
Or take over another board using admin powers contrary to admin's own word. Glad you're figuring out how this shit works mah dude. Subvert by putting the pressure on the top down that way all your crap rollssssss dooowwwnnnnhiiiiilll.
What you've failed to ask is whether it's true. As per usual. Why is that?
What is a global notable? I haven't come across it before.
(you)
What are they?
F und G
I think the idea that a matter like this would be decided now is a laughable notion. Really? It makes no sense, so whatever. It's just an optics game from a stale honeypot that needs activity for whatevever reason like got a quota to hit and feed their children or whatever the fuck. That's the only logical reason to float lures to people you say constantly to go away to.
I understand it is a special class of notable. Who sets it and why and what is the procedure for removal?
Well that's alright then! Disregard my line there.
Well not specifically you, just the you that situation applies to. A lot of times I just say whatever to whoever because afaict anon is anon, makes no difference to me. Sometimes I'm directing it at the wrong person, but if it ain't you I never intended any of it to (you), throw it at (them). They know who they are.
Okay good, now all you have to do is make sure that active baker on duty isn't a controllable thing or else you get power forcing global notables eventually through state sanctioned bakers.
Clinesmith before Durham. Only took a year.
Simulacra in Simula
>their face when they are a cartoon pepe irl
>Once it degenerates to name-calling, what can be accomplished?
Names will be called. Have you seriously not figured that out yet? Like, you do not need to control every aspect of someone's communication so that someone else who hears it won't get their feelings hurt. If you always want forward progress, you'll have a hard time relating to NORMAL people in a business relationship, much less autists who will throw a spanner at you for years for trying it once. This is why I tried to teach you da wei, but you're so identitarian that you refused and that was based on from where I hail at the same time telling me to go there.
Think of it this way. In Dune Paul Atreides survived riding the ornithopter into a massive dust storm. ANON is the dust storm. The harder you try to force through ego to "ensure progress" "so they only be nice" or "whatever the fuck I have decided to name my censorship" the worst you end off.
This is why you need to understand the culture before you lead here, because otherwise you ask silly questions like that and all that happens is we realize how little you get anon, at all. It just runs so much deeper than you know, and it's part and parcel to WHY we're able to do the things we do. A comparable notion is the military seeking hackers because it somewhat vaguely realized that their stickler ways sure did please the bosses, but the talent was not at ALL interested in pleasing higher ups. The military ended up changing THEIR ways because they were going to lose the fucking war JUST FOR INSISTING ON FORCING THROUGH THEIR IDEA OF MOST DESIRABLE EXPECTATIONS.
So the point of that is to ask if the bigger war (the one that matters) is worth losing by grasping the objective too hard? What will be to gain from it, to fight so hard to get your position after you were banned, which you could have gotten around easily, by the way, if you cared to. Why didn't you? Because it's cover story I think, that you're going to lose it by trying to hard to control a herd of cats. When you think about it, you're never going to change others who have no interest in your judgements because 1. already proven themselves to not care about position, and 2. obviously were not transitioned in a friendly way, but in a subversive way after years of your effort, chomping at the bit to get where you are so badly that you think you've got it now, and that overrules anything anyone can say about you. So what's left to change? Because I don't think you speak convincing anon culture enough to get what you want.