10 minutes with no bread again
someone forget they were baking?
kek
>Ultra Notables
I actually like this
I do like the idea of some kind of semi-persistent notable section that goes between the "per-bread' notables and the GLOBALS
essentially, for things that are going to span multiple breads
-a topic that remains notable for mutliple days with daily updates/ changes
-a dig with a lot of anon participation that flows over multiple breads
etcetera
kek
substance over source anon
what do you think about the idea
would it be good to have an addition section in the notables that was semi-persistent across breads
>So would only work if the anon(s) proposing this are willing to support the thread
it doesnt have to tie to a seperate thread
it could just be a semi-persistent section that rolls forward from bread to bread until the item in it is no longer relevent
threads might be relevent for a significant enough dig that spans multiple days in the semi-persistent section, and finally establishes itself enough to need a thread
but the section doesnt necessarily need to be thread-based
exactly
the seperate threads are not generally for congreagating in
they are best (imo) used as a MORE PRESISTENT repository of information relevent to a specific subject of digging
buns from posts in the general bread are nice, but unless they keep getting posted every bread
they slide away
a dedicated thread is a nice place to keep everything from a bun, and keep adding to it over time
but the point is to bring that information back the general bread when you are active for sharing with ALL of the anons and lurkers who are here
>can keep it up in the doughs rather than try to maintain a new thread
THIS
exactly
making a thread for it is resource heavy and requires mainenence/ defending
a section in the notables dough would be lightweight and very usable
>I thought the CEMEX dig was going to take off again, but once Dayshift came in it was overlooked
this is exactly the "problem" I am looking to solve with this whole 'semi-persistent' section idea
it happens a lot
good digs with mutliple anons participating organically
they just fall appart after 2-3 bread change-overs
and once those SAME ANONS get back to the board the next day for their shift
its slid all the way out of the notables
this seems like a problem worth solving
>Please don't do ultra notables. Anything but that.
kek
we probably shouldnt call it that
but I still thought it was kekworthy
>I don't see a need for it myself.
if you had to pin me down on a "need"
this is as close to I get to a "problem worth solving"
see: >>16343252
>International Q Research Threads
>'Member?:
I do
I also remember like 5 pags of Dough before the notables
I do like things slimmer, though
>how would the posts be different from regular notables? got examples?
okay
so the first and biggest difference
this list does NOT go with a bread number
it is persistent across breads
so it doesn't slide down into previosly collected
biggest hurdles I see?
how do we somehow "agree" that something should go there
how do we somehow "agree" that something is 'done now' and should be removed
functionally, like all notables, its going to have to be bakers discretion at the end of the day
example:
dig "X"
dig X starts in bread #1
3 anons participate and it develops over the bread
a bun is made to colate the dig
the bun gets notabled
bread #2 the dig continues, develops, changes
the bun gets updated
new bun get notabled in bread #2
bread #3 rolls around and all the anons have left
4 more breads go bye and the bun is now in "previously collected" and essentially invisible
the 3 orriginal anons return the next day
dig back through the breads
re-post the bun
and continue the dig
if that bun lived in a semi-persistent section in the notables dough, it would be there when those three anons returned
and there would be a MUCH higher chance of 'other-shift' anons participating in this dig
true
>Do you remember any of these?
also a good point
thank you for the examples anon
this is exactly what I am talking about
but this already looks way bigger than I would "want" it to be
kek!
>Why not just add it to globals until interest wanes?
we used to do exactly that
I dont know why globals got locked up nazi style
>If shit is still relevant a week later, then it will still be notable as things change and evolve.
agreed
>If you want long term Uber fucking Notables - Make a new bread just for those.
we used to use Globals like this…
>As a result, International breads have been less visible than they once were.
this is true
and I would aquiesce that this is probably a bad thing
and that a compromise of bread slimness to improve visibility of internation breads would not be the worst thing in the world
I just see that slipperly slope looming over the horizon
/warroom/ section feelz
kek
>Nice and simple eh?
one aims for simplicity
>Don't start assuming it's happening.
kek
I am not THAT naive
>as long as they don’t grow without limit
this is one major hurdle I see with this "idea"
>suppose baker makes a controversial choice. can next baker reverse it?
exactly the kind of issue I see springing up as a result of this/
and I am all ears for brainstorming on ideas
I tend to 'err on the side of, baker on duty always gets to decide what they want to do
one baker "controversailly" removes something
if anons are persistent and LOGICAL enough, they actually convince next baker to add it back
no reason that baker cant add it back
I can obviously see this becoming a wedge
but the whole damn board is a wedge
kek
>Followed by board announcements and notables
so Globals areJUSTboard announcements nao?
>Maybe call the Section "Ongoing Digs?"
it seems it would be a good idea to seperate such a section from the Globals if the globals are going to be strictly board announcements
>We will always call it that even if it has a different name.
chek't
>Kudos to that anon.
clearly it was Highest Ranking Anon
the anons have spoken
the notables which persist from bread to bread are the highest ranking of the notables
it is objectively true
kek!
participaring in a discussion
I dont bake
and I am not an admin
so weather it happens or not isnt 'really' up to me
but this is our board anon
if you want to be a part of it
better speak up when the convo is happenin'
>equals GLOBAL NOTABLES no?
essentially
yes
but new admin has changed slightly, and only uses globals for "board announcements" nao
>What is a global notable?
>NOTABLES have always been at the discretion of the current baker so there is that.
absolutely so
and I dont think that shouldeverchange
>you say constantly to go away to
I'm not an admin anon
I am actually one of the fags responsile for META currently being locked
but I understand your position kek
whats the fucking point, right?
>Who sets it
baker on duty
>and why and what is the procedure for removal?
purely discretionary
based on metrics that will change from baker to baker
but I am open to a first principle that could pottentially be universally accepted given enough logical discussion
>This is Graveyard Shift
kek
your not wrong
I havent had a discussion like this between this many anons in a while
its one of the things that sets Graveyard appart
/comfy/
>The only digs i can recall that appeared in Globals were board related
after the election that shall not be named globals were used for per-state tracking of fuckery
>They know who they are.
5:5 anon
they will understand who it is directed towards when they read it inded
>state sanctioned bakers
yes comrade
the state absolutely makes the best toilet paper
hail admin!
down with OSS!
>pssst, shhhhh anon, they'll send you straight to the gulags if they hear you talking like that!
>As for Hang Time? How about 30 days
I am thinking more like a couple days
a week max unless there is ineraction/ updates
>how about at least four separate anon nominations for it to go in?
thats a lot harder to quantify than it sounds
and it just wont work in practice
its baker discretion, and I dare you to impose a rule over a baker on duty that doesnt want to follow it
kek
yu seem niece
>a cartoon pepe irl
thats a man, baby