Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 29, 2022, 9:04 a.m. No.16362610   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2613 >>2732 >>7986

>>16360962, >>16361893

 

  1. You want a new dough section but instead of asking, you changed the dough wo/telling anyone.

  2. In discussions in meta, you don't want to get into specifics, too impatient.

  3. When you post a Trump bun in Generals (example of new section), it's long and dense. Causes baker on duty to ask, "What is this?"

  4. You reply rudely. A different baker tells you off.

  5. In early am post, you complain about both bakers and BO.

 

It's not BO or bakers, it's YOU. Learn how to work with people if you want to make constructive changes.

 

Here is my decision.

 

  • No new section. Pain in the ass for bakers who are always dealing with huge notable buns.

  • Instead, do exactly what you proposed to do in the CAP โ€“ post a Trump Bun one or more times a day. Whether it gets notabled or not, can still post more than once. Make a thread or regular report if you want to do more.

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 29, 2022, 9:05 a.m. No.16362613   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2650 >>2695 >>2732 >>6340 >>9038

>>16362610

 

CAP:

  • Baker #1 wants Trump Globals as new dough section, tries inserting them into the dough but gets- it tossed by admins bc didn't ask about dough change

  • There's a discussion in Meta; BO raises q's but Baker #1 is impatient.

  • BO generates guidelines for POSSIBLE section and asks in an email if he'll take responsibility. He ignores and again wants to just do it.

  • Generates a Trump bun. Posted in rally bread #20697.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16360247.html#q16360575

  • Talks about his plansโ€ฆ.

  • On duty baker baker #2 is not interested, says he doesn't want more more work for bakers but willing to put buns in notables

  • Baker #3 acknowledges baker #2's comments.

  • Baker #1 gets mad & insults on-duty baker #2, causing Baker #4 to say he won't even notable the buns.

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 30, 2022, 10:15 a.m. No.16369038   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9054 >>1358

>>16367839

Thanks for your thoughts but looks like you missed the discussion.

Last week, a baker floated the idea of a Trump dough section. Tues night? Section was added to bread Wed am, but didn't tell anons before, just did it. Removed by BV.

After that, discussion went on until Sunday, here and in General. see #20695 (etc.)

Where it went: See above.

Gist is that bakers are busy, don't need extra work of coordinating a dough section. some weighed in here >>16362613

Global notable added yesterday.

>>16362680 Plz use digs, buns, reports & threads for important info on PDJT

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 30, 2022, 10:26 a.m. No.16369101   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9156

>>16368798

Not my post and not my position.

 

>>16367898

>Handoff

We all do the best we can to make this place work with limited info and sketchy comms. Dough changes affect all bakers, and some only drop in every so often. Easy to miss the memo. Thanks for dough support, if there's problems, can be fixed, no worries about handoffs.

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 31, 2022, 8:03 a.m. No.16374028   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16373283

Understand your concerns, but do you really think most anons have trouble finding Trump info?

 

In addition to the PDJT accounts anons can follow on on TS, Gab, Rumble and Qagg, posts on or by PDJT are always picked up in notables.

 

All the notables are in a pinned thread in the catalog and can be searched with Control F.

Anons can search qresear.ch as well.

 

Also, anything from PDJT is picked up by many Telegram accounts - most anons follow accounts that regularly pass along PDJT announcements.

 

Making a Trump THREAD where anons could dig deeper might be of real value:

  • list the resource links on OP

  • use thread for the latest news and discussion. - synthesize the best of what is found and post on Generals.

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 31, 2022, 8:33 a.m. No.16374194   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4426 >>7555 >>7633

>>16373502

>>16373792

Anons have many differences, some from past history. Can't change the past, only the future. We share a common goal but can disagree on how to reach it.

In Jan, there were two doughs being used - now there is one, only because all bakers cooperated to make that possible.

Appreciate that cooperation, hope it can continue.

 

BTW, admins currently do very little baking. There are many IP hashes in use atm, likely from drop-in and returning bakers. IDK. It's not up to admins to bake, completely their own decision.

Anonymous ID: 19bd1d May 31, 2022, 10:59 p.m. No.16378866   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9008

>>16374426

Could be anybody, really.

 

>>16376588

this sounds right: >>16377537

change vpn channel or use static ip

 

>>16377185

>>16376588

U think site owner has time to target specific users or that he would even bother?

 

>>16377555

>who is doing all the (many) e-bakes then?

Beats me. Many done by regular bakers who drop by to see if an ebake is needed. Or by retired bakers who no longer bake.