test
Any ideas on what should/could be done about the B post on /projectdcomms/ ?
this drop documents the reason for the /patriotsfight/ board
and the reason Q took it down
a new board was then requested
==Formation of 'clean' board possible to lock in trip(s) issues w/safeguards.==
Q
>Formation of 'clean' board possible to lock in trip(s) > issues w/safeguards.
>date = Nov. 21 2019
4 days later
New board created [pending approval /CM/]
/projectDcomms/
Q
>date = Nov. 25 2019
Formation of 'clean' board possible
to lock in trip(s)
issues w/safeguards
New board created
[pending approval /CM/]
Q
Reconcile that with: >>>/projectdcomms/111
how is that 'clean' ?
Further demonstration of Q's use of the /projectdcomms/ board
>>7556980
What about when verifying new trip re: projectDcomms?
[ie calling our shot]
Standard deviation broken?
Greatest statistical anomaly witnessed or……
Q
>This META is for QRESEARCH board ONLY!!!
the Q Research board exists because of Q
damn near everything that is "canonical" around here was directed by Q
Q directed the creation of and use of the /projectdcomms/ board
Q uses that board for a specific reason that integrates with Q's direct interaction with anon
the interaction that happen on the QRESEACH board
>All other board's issues belong on those or other boards METAs, NOT HERE!
Q instructed the creation of the /projectdcomms/ board HERE on QRESEARCH
there is no META on /projectdcomms/
there is no way to comm with the BO of /projectdcomms/
do you have any suggestions for contacting the BO of /projectdcomms/ ?
it used to be CodeMonkey
but he is gone now
does anyone know who BO's /projectdcomms/?
the /projectdcomms/ board logs are not public
pic related
>Doubt JW wants to tread on Q's board,
the treading has already occured
>why compound an error?
correction of error does not compound it
>TRIP is the security.
if TRIPCODE is the "only" security being referenced then there is no need for the 'clean' board
that security (Q's trip) exists on every board
Q specifically directed the creation of a 'clean' board
allowing the B post to remain is not 'clean'
>Q is BO of his board
roger that
>no way to comm with Q
well, there was this one time…
NO BREAD IN CATALOG
>the motivation
PDJT events/connections/information tracking digging
>notable [PDJT] dig / Q Post correlation in the current bread and it's all being buried with no single point of collection for visibility.
for that reason
>Why didn't you start planning ahead, say, in March?
its not March right now
its NOW right now
>Once baker is used to the daily PDJT report, will add along with other notables anytime you post it.
and it will slide down the notables list into previously collected notables in ~8 hours unless anon hangs around to post it at least once in every bread…
>All are in agreement the 45 notable bun, if it exists, shouldn't be aggregated.
I agree with this
>You were one of the people discussing a different approach,
well fundamentally, we are talking about the same problem
semi-persistent information
that would be repetative to post over and over again in each breads notable bun
BUT
is worth displaying in EVERY bread for visibility
>so a section for DJT section is what you are up for now?
absolutely
I agree it can look like a slippery slope if you consider just putting -anything- trump right there
the low hanging fruit is rally/ event dates
IMO
those (Trumps scheduled speaking events) MUST BE in 'some' section of the dough
in EVERY bread
I would LOVE a semi-persistent section for multi-bread digs
but I wouldnt classify that in the same level of 'need it now' as the PDJT events schedule
>cm is tanking the board.
I thought cm left on a ship the moment 8kun went live?
>uss monitor is hitting the rocks
yeah
that one
project Odin?
Lokinet?
so many vaporcoins?
>How long was the board transition discussed before it was put into action?
I am sincerely curious as the the answer for this one….
>Baker #1 gets mad & insults on-duty baker #2, causing Baker #3 to say he won't even notable the buns.
so thats like 3 faggots that need to post tits or take a walk
>All the bakers are BVs.
correct
and they all appear to have vaginas as well
>This is why nobody else bakes.
chek't
amen anon
>FYSA - if you email the BO anything you say will probably end up here whether you want it to or not.
you used email nigga?
apply that logic to -ANY-thing you send over email fren
its -ALL- comp'd
BO using email for /COMM/'s is pajeet tier
any anon who falls for that trap deserves the honeypot they fall into
POTUS said to find a new board fren
I am not going to tell (You) what to do
but reconcile it for yourself
as always
the choice is yours
>you usedemailnigga?
>apply that logic to -ANY-thing you send over email fren
>its -ALL- comp'd
>BO using emailfor /COMM/'s is pajeet tier
>any anon who falls for that trap deserves the honeypot they fall into
and then this happens:
which further re-enforces this: >>16366356
>bakers are busy
>don't need extra work
5:5
bakers have not had to bother themselves with maintaining the latest Q drops in over a year
so I guess this kind of slippage is to be expected
>sooooooo much work for my finger I have to hold it down 0.001 seconds longer.
pretty patriotic
>It's not bakers that are pushing back.
5:5 anon
totally agree
its BO and her team of BV's
who are also 90% of the baking crew 'round here
I dont know if you were ever around for it
our current BO + BV = 'historic' /comms/ crew
>i dint see you around when i spent many hours combining and mastering the current dough
the absolue state