How long was the board transition discussed before it was put into action? You'll claim this has nothing to do with QR, but how can it have been done immediately without prior planning? Would you like to fill us in the details on how long it took to complain to Jim? Was it a lengthy process, or a quick one? Open and fair, or secret and cabal?
I'm expecting you to "I am once again asking you to not listen", but the questions reveal why my concerns about Jim are materially relevant.
Jim isn't alone, it's a conspiracy, the very opposite of LIGHT of TRUTH. Dark deeds, obscuring and and misinformation, which anyone can puzzle it out and determine what's going on. How could it be otherwise given how things went down? A small group, a cabal, no openness at all, no truth at all, no one deserves to know according to them, no question put to them is real, no concern is legitimate.
As if I would receive answers if I emailed, I would JUST PUBLISH THE ENTIRE CONVERSATION HERE IMMEDIATELY, So WHAT is the difference? YOU HAVE NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY WITH ME because what I'm asking for is Open Honest Truth IN THE FIRST PLACE.
It's an un-logic'd out way to denigrate the line of questioning with smear campaigns, and also never once being honest in the first place. Why not answer publically? Because it's a cabal who prefers working in the dark as it has done from the beginning. >inb4 redirect
>causing Baker #3 to say he won't even notable the buns.
You mean Baker #4?
>On duty baker baker #2 is not interested, says he doesn't want more more work for bakers but willing to put buns in notables
>Baker #1 gets mad & insults on-duty baker #2
You mean they -traded insults-?
You must like Baker #2.
Are they a part of the cabal?
5:5
Therefore be silent? No, from me. If MIL IC know, they know silently. If I know, I know publically with logic and loudness. I will not be silenced, no matter who says what, because alignment with Truth has no intermediaries.
>Many are creating their own narratives. Some are spreading lies for attention or profit. Too many making this military intelligence operation look like a conspiracy or a joke. This isn't a game or a popularity contest.
Who are you thinking of?
And yet the ones with questions unanswered get banned, hard or soft. Activate almonds!
What was the memo? BO is surrogate baker? While also guilt tripping into baking but you better not step out of line? How strict can you afford to be while also needing willing bakers? What's funny about you running to rat to BO is that you think BO is over Bakers, A BO's role is facilitating baking, CONTROLLING is not it.
WEIRD! How did it happen?! YOU MEAN that was an utterly ineffective display of power that only works if you agree to it? STRANGE! Boy the hubris on that anon, to have fooled you into thinking they run BAKERS' show. If it is thusly, why isn't it thusly? Because, by God, you can't fight the Red Wave.
Have you noticed how many spurious SSL certs Jim's server is pushing out that claim to be for other domain names?
"We did it, Doge. Yur gunna be the next POTATUS"
We now have proof positive that BO is Trump averse.
But that's not what is being done, now is it? You're telling bakers that it's too much work for you THEREFORE you SHALL NOT do it yourself? What's the logic there?
Never said it was yours, but enjoy working for the dart mockingbird.
A section is in the bun, is it not? It's all a part of the baked bread. Are you going to misunderstand the analogy and end up inversion philosophy? Anti-Trump reeks in here. Heavens no, work? Oh man that copypasta while copypastaing in the first place is sooooooo much work for my finger I have to hold it down 0.001 seconds longer.
Ask Dart.
State sanctioned bakers?
Cabal?
Is there a difference?
No one knows but timing says there was a conspiracy.
>>16368403 OB
It's not staff that is claimed staff now. Already scum, this current cabal of secretive subversives who planed for how long to usurp the board. If you're going to play this definitions, game, zoom out and look at the larger context. As if baking now is the ultimate designator of a moral being, when staff have pulled off a literal coup. Are you sure you have a handle on what a good person is?