>>16348407 lb
>the jury won't convict.
Maybe most of the jury members will not vote for conviction. But there's got to be a few jurors who will vote guilty and stand firm. That would result in a 'hung' jury. Then what? Could Durham then move for a new trial with a change of venue out of DC?
Lawfags! Does my theory hold water.
Antony Blinken is a psychopathic little boy who took acting lessons and thinks he's everything. China's embarrassing him in Alaska doesn't faze him. Many congress persons calling him out in congressional hearings doesn't faze him. Can you picture the little shit meeting with Lavrov?
Is there a law that says a jury which voted 3-9 to convict can not be deemed a hung jury?
So, if the jury is hung then Durham can refile. Maybe even argue for a change of venue or maybe some legal trick I don't know about.
But I can see your thinking. So he doesn't get a conviction in the specific case of lying to the FBI on Sussman. Maybe he has entered enough evidence in the court record to use when he makes his RICO indictments.