\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 5:32 p.m. No.16353558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3566 >>3789

2020 election to cost $14 billion, blowing away spending …

https://www.opensecrets.org › news › 2020/10 › cost-of…

Oct 28, 2020 — The total cost of the 2020 election will nearly reach an unprecedented $14 billion, making it the most expensive election in history and twice as expensive as …

\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 5:33 p.m. No.16353566   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16353558

 

>2020 election to cost $14 billion, blowing away spending …

^=28 billion JAck in the box tacos

>https://www.opensecrets.org › news › 2020/10 › cost-of…

 

>Oct 28, 2020 — The total cost of the 2020 election will nearly reach an unprecedented $14 billion, making it the most expensive election in history and twice as expensive as …

^=201.4 tacos per starving mexican

\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 7:04 p.m. No.16354018   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Hac habitasse platea dictumst vestibulum rhoncus. Feugiat in ante metus dictum at tempor commodo ullamcorper. Lacus vel facilisis volutpat est velit egestas dui. Ultricies leo integer malesuada nunc vel. Mi quis hendrerit dolor magna eget est lorem ipsum dolor. Nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam ultrices sagittis orci a. Augue eget arcu dictum varius. Ultrices eros in cursus turpis. Quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae proin sagittis. Purus gravida quis blandit turpis cursus in. Arcu risus quis varius quam quisque. Senectus et netus et malesuada. Eleifend quam adipiscing vitae proin. Accumsan in nisl nisi scelerisque eu ultrices vitae auctor eu. Dui sapien eget mi proin sed. Fringilla ut morbi tincidunt augue interdum. Vulputate dignissim suspendisse in est ante. Est placerat in egestas erat imperdiet sed.

 

Euismod lacinia at quis risus sed vulputate odio ut enim. Nibh ipsum consequat nisl vel pretium lectus quam. Vel pharetra vel turpis nunc eget lorem. Dignissim enim sit amet venenatis. Quis varius quam quisque id diam vel quam. Et ultrices neque ornare aenean euismod. Amet est placerat in egestas. Vestibulum sed arcu non odio. Integer feugiat scelerisque varius morbi enim nunc faucibus a. Quam viverra orci sagittis eu volutpat. Sit amet est placerat in egestas.

 

Ornare massa eget egestas purus viverra accumsan. Velit dignissim sodales ut eu sem integer vitae. Volutpat maecenas volutpat blandit aliquam. Velit laoreet id donec ultrices tincidunt. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar neque. Elit sed vulputate mi sit amet. Amet nisl purus in mollis nunc sed id semper risus. Vivamus arcu felis bibendum ut tristique. Laoreet id donec ultrices tincidunt arcu non sodales neque. Lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum. Sodales ut etiam sit amet nisl purus in mollis. Aenean vel elit scelerisque mauris.

 

Elit at imperdiet dui accumsan sit amet. Ut lectus arcu bibendum at varius vel pharetra vel turpis. Est pellentesque elit ullamcorper dignissim cras tincidunt lobortis. Convallis aenean et tortor at risus. Nunc sed id semper risus in hendrerit. Sit amet volutpat consequat mauris nunc. Tincidunt dui ut ornare lectus sit. Odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed. Velit laoreet id donec ultrices tincidunt arcu non sodales neque. Eget egestas purus viverra accumsan in nisl nisi. Ac feugiat sed lectus vestibulum mattis ullamcorper velit sed. Amet commodo nulla facilisi nullam vehicula ipsum a arcu cursus.

 

Augue lacus viverra vitae congue eu consequat ac felis donec. Id eu nisl nunc mi ipsum faucibus vitae aliquet. Ut eu sem integer vitae justo. Convallis a cras semper auctor neque vitae tempus quam. Eu volutpat odio facilisis mauris. Arcu cursus euismod quis viverra nibh cras. Viverra nibh cras pulvinar mattis nunc. Feugiat vivamus at augue eget arcu dictum. Consequat nisl vel pretium lectus quam id leo in vitae. Tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis. Tellus pellentesque eu tincidunt tortor. Justo eget magna fermentum iaculis eu non. Luctus venenatis lectus magna fringilla urna porttitor rhoncus dolor purus. Fringilla est ullamcorper eget nulla facilisi etiam dignissim. Et ligula ullamcorper malesuada proin libero nunc consequat interdum. Nullam ac tortor vitae purus faucibus ornare suspendisse sed nisi.

\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 7:12 p.m. No.16354080   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Formal fallacies

Main article: Formal fallacy

 

A formal fallacy is an error in the argument's form.[2] All formal fallacies are types of non sequitur.

 

Appeal to probability – a statement that takes something for granted because it would probably be the case (or might be the case).[3][4]

Argument from fallacy (also known as the fallacy fallacy) – the assumption that, if a particular argument for a "conclusion" is fallacious, then the conclusion by itself is false.[5]

Base rate fallacy – making a probability judgment based on conditional probabilities, without taking into account the effect of prior probabilities.[6]

Conjunction fallacy – the assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them.[7]

Non-sequitur fallacy - where the conclusion does not logically follow the premise. [8]

Masked-man fallacy (illicit substitution of identicals) – the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one.[9]

\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 7:13 p.m. No.16354097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Propositional fallacies

 

A propositional fallacy is an error that concerns compound propositions. For a compound proposition to be true, the truth values of its constituent parts must satisfy the relevant logical connectives that occur in it (most commonly: [and], [or], [not], [only if], [if and only if]). The following fallacies involve relations whose truth values are not guaranteed and therefore not guaranteed to yield true conclusions.

Types of propositional fallacies:

 

Affirming a disjunct – concluding that one disjunct of a logical disjunction must be false because the other disjunct is true; A or B; A, therefore not B.[10]

Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[10]

Denying the antecedent – the consequent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be false because the antecedent is false; if A, then B; not A, therefore not B.[10]

\_ヘ(ᐖ◞)、 ID: 88d917 May 27, 2022, 7:14 p.m. No.16354106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Quantification fallacies

 

A quantification fallacy is an error in logic where the quantifiers of the premises are in contradiction to the quantifier of the conclusion.

Types of quantification fallacies:

 

Existential fallacy – an argument that has a universal premise and a particular conclusion.[11]

 

Formal syllogistic fallacies

 

Syllogistic fallacies – logical fallacies that occur in syllogisms.

 

Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) – a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion, but at least one negative premise.[11]

Fallacy of exclusive premises – a categorical syllogism that is invalid because both of its premises are negative.[11]

Fallacy of four terms (quaternio terminorum) – a categorical syllogism that has four terms.[12]

Illicit major – a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its major term is not distributed in the major premise but distributed in the conclusion.[11]

Illicit minor – a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its minor term is not distributed in the minor premise but distributed in the conclusion.[11]

Negative conclusion from affirmative premises (illicit affirmative) – a categorical syllogism has a negative conclusion but affirmative premises.[11]

Fallacy of the undistributed middle – the middle term in a categorical syllogism is not distributed.[13]

Modal fallacy – confusing necessity with sufficiency. A condition X is necessary for Y if X is required for even the possibility of Y. X does not bring about Y by itself, but if there is no X, there will be no Y. For example, oxygen is necessary for fire. But one cannot assume that everywhere there is oxygen, there is fire. A condition X is sufficient for Y if X, by itself, is enough to bring about Y. For example, riding the bus is a sufficient mode of transportation to get to work. But there are other modes of transportation – car, taxi, bicycle, walking – that can be used.

Modal scope fallacy – a degree of unwarranted necessity is placed in the conclusion.