Anonymous ID: 6295d4 May 27, 2022, 8:36 p.m. No.16354550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4574 >>4582 >>4590 >>4611

Russia Blacklist

#703, Jeremy Sivits

 

Jeremy Sivits was another soldier convicted (sentenced to 1 year in confinement) for abusing prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in the 2003 timeframe. There are several reasons to think that more is going on than meets the eye with several of the names on the Russia Blacklist, including this one.

 

According to wiki (which we know is an internet outlet intelligence propaganda), Jeremy Charles Sivits died on January 16, 2022, at the age of 42, from COVID. First, it is odd that Russia would Blacklist people from entering the country if they are already known to be dead. This has come up before with other names on the Blacklist of people who are known to be dead, I know, but let's move on from that for now. It would be very difficult for a dead person to enter Russia. At a minimum, the blacklist is simply trying to draw attention to certain individuals. And in some cases, it may be more than just that.

 

Second, the claim that Jeremy Sivits died from COVID is dubious. I think it's very clear to most people by now that many of the people who were reported as dying from COVID didn't really die from COVID exclusively–especially if they were only 42 years old. The question needs to be asked for certain individuals who died from COVID, or if they died suddenly otherwise, if they really even died at all. Note that a fake death is one of the primary tools used by spooks to extract themselves from certain situations. At a minimum, you have to ask yourself: "Did Jeremy Sivits really die, or was his death faked?"

 

And third, it's worth considering the Russian government's rationale for including so many US soldiers who were convicted of abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib facility to their blacklist in the first place. With so many US criminals Russia has to choose from to put on the first round of the blacklist, including individuals who probably directly affected Russian citizens or its territories, why go back to a supposed crime occurred 20 years ago against Iraqi militants? Why feature individuals who probably had never been to Russia and who no reason to visit Russia in the future? Why blacklist people who had already been convicted of a crime and had served their sentence? What threat are these people to Russia?

 

This factors all require a reconciliation before the Abu Ghraib prison guards are on the blacklist for their previous actions at the prison. I believe there's much more to it than just that. I could dig some more on that, but I think I already know the answer…

 

As a hint, there was a curious case of a court martial in 2004 for a British soldier who was charged with orchestrating a hoax that included faked photos showing British soldiers apparently abusing Iraqi prisoners. One image purportedly showed a soldier urinating on a hooded and bound prisoner, with another apparently showing a prisoner being hit by a rifle. The photos came out just weeks after the first images of US atrocities in Abu Ghraib.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/oct/07/pressandpublishing.iraq

 

If anyone is interested, I can gather some more evidence for my theory on this. Not sure there are any anons here any more.

 

https://www.bedfordgazette.com/obituaries/jeremy-charles-sivits/article_9a9f89c4-2799-53d3-b5b0-63b4de98e4a0.html

Anonymous ID: 6295d4 May 27, 2022, 8:52 p.m. No.16354624   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4636 >>4642

>>16354582

 

My theory is that the Abu Ghraib prison abuse was faked.

 

Why you ask? What possible purpose would it serve to humiliate the US Military and the USA?

 

What if it was an intelligence operation to antagonize and agitate the larger Arab world, part of a long-planned strategy to keep a 20 year, slow burning war going throughout the Middle East. It would help recruit more enemies for the US.

 

'Murica needs enemies to destroy and nations to conquer.

Anonymous ID: 6295d4 May 27, 2022, 9:15 p.m. No.16354736   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4758 >>4799 >>4824

>>16354642

 

You are right, it's possible that both happened.

But there are several reasons to think the prison photos were staged.

 

No superiors were implicated. Probably only "actors" were involved. And they probably never went to jail because they were either MI or spooks.

 

The scenes in the photos were campy, compared to what real torture would look like.

 

Don't get me wrong. There WAS torture going on there, and elsewhere, and some prisoners died. The CIA torture-interrogation program was given the OK by the government with legal analysis to do back it up, though it was controversial at the time.

 

But where was the evidence of that kind of brutal torture? Why did the full extent of this never come to light? Why were there no prosecutions?

 

The abuse seemed specifically created to outrage Muslims. What was shown was humiliation, not torture. Naked men in piles, oral sex, gay poses, etc.

 

The outrage was intended to produce more enemies.

Anonymous ID: 6295d4 May 27, 2022, 9:40 p.m. No.16354876   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16354824

>Sy Hersh

 

At the time I thought he was doing something heroic. But now, I realize that things almost never are what they appear, and especially when it's coming from ANY major media source.