Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 9:46 p.m. No.16354913   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16354876

>>>16354824 pb

>

>>Sy Hersh

>

>At the time I thought he was doing something heroic. But now, I realize that things almost never are what they appear, and especially when it's coming from ANY major media source.

yeah, except Sy Hearsh' writings are not published in the American MSM … haven't been since I don't know …. for instance look for the Libya piece "Rat line and Red Line" … Hearsh could not find an American paper to publish it

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 9:56 p.m. No.16354950   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16354876

>>>16354824 pb

>

>>Sy Hersh

>

>At the time I thought he was doing something heroic. But now, I realize that things almost never are what they appear, and especially when it's coming from ANY major media source.

yeah, except Sy Hearsh' writings are not published in the American MSM … haven't been since I don't know …. for instance look for the Libya piece "Rat line and Red Line" … Hearsh could not find an American paper to publish it

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 10:01 p.m. No.16354973   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>Israeli advisors were helping the Military, they knew the best methods to humiliate Arabs

 

"Mossad" advising a pathetic kowtowing Stupid Party cuck, kek, hilarious

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 10:07 p.m. No.16354995   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5005

>>16354953

>now try to imagine our country if all those black abortions had been legally prevented.

that's the Freakonomics thesis

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_effect

 

The effect of legalized abortion on crime (also the Donohue–Levitt hypothesis) is a controversial hypothesis about the reduction in crime in the decades following the legalization of abortion. Proponents argue that the availability of abortion resulted in fewer births of children at the highest risk of committing crime. The earliest research suggesting such an effect was a 1966 study in Sweden. In 2001, Steven Levitt of the University of Chicago and John Donohue of Yale University argued, citing their research and earlier studies, that children who are unwanted or whose parents cannot support them are likelier to become criminals. This idea was further popularized by its inclusion in the book Freakonomics, which Levitt co-wrote.

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 10:15 p.m. No.16355026   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5037 >>5073

>>16354904

>These speeches Reagan gave are pretty much the best speeches ever given. Trump's speech is great too.

>>16354922

 

the populist campaign stump speech in the video was written for Trump by Stephen MiIller, like the Inauguration speech … Trump wasn't totally comfortable with the excessive populist rhetoric …

 

fun fact: the same guy who wrote jokes for Reagan was writing jokes for Trump too

 

… In the Trump era, the line between politics and comedy is so blurred it’s easy to mistake one for the other. Last March, CNN ran an article titled “This may be the scariest thing Donald Trump has said as President.” At a private event, following the news President Xi Jinping of China had removed term limits, Trump quipped: “He’s now president for life,” adding, “Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot some day.”

 

The remark was taken literally by many reports, and denounced as a horrifying harbinger of Trump’s dictatorial designs.

 

Comedy writer Doug Gamble knew better.

 

The line wasn’t an off-the-cuff remark where Trump was actually considering making himself dictator; it was in fact an unused joke Gamble had scripted for the Gridiron Dinner – a well-known political roast that occurred the night before. A veteran of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and other such satirical events, Gamble had been asked by Trump’s staff to submit jokes.

 

https://www.newstatesman.com/long-reads/2018/06/secret-weapon-meet-canadian-comedian-who-writes-jokes-trump

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 10:32 p.m. No.16355097   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5107

>>16355068

>

>

>>>16355004

>

>My uncles rest in Arlington. It is on my mind, all the time. I have carried the Best of the Best in their golden years, honored them while they were still alive. I gave them a frame of reference on The World they could relate to, and they gave me their stories. All I could do for them was make it hurt less. I have had vets die in my arms. My vets are all dead. All the money I could get, I gave them. Now I look after their wives.

>

>I know my history. I agree with Abbie Hoffman. I met him after he came up. He made an impression on me, and me on him. He said about me, "Is this the best we got?"

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 11:21 p.m. No.16355277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5291

>>16355219

>>>16355131 (You)

>

>Everybody wants a healthy community. When "some people" work to deny this, guys like Abbie and Donald step up.

 

I've seen anons who've been in to guys like Timothy Leary and Robert Anton Wilson … I find it extremely improbable that these kind of counter culture figures Abbie Hoffman included would have become Trump supporters

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 27, 2022, 11:42 p.m. No.16355328   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5335

>>16355254

what was Q's point about CISA?

 

this is what CISA stated …

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

 

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

 

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election

Anonymous ID: ed9424 May 28, 2022, 12:30 a.m. No.16355512   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5523

>>16355481

>>16355481

>Learn to discern.

>

>Read the signs.

I guess that's WHO because that's Hippocratic sign sigil what ever

 

The caduceus is the traditional symbol of Hermes and features two snakes winding around an often winged staff. It is often used as a symbol of medicine, especially in the United States, despite its ancient and consistent associations with trade, liars, thieves, eloquence, negotiation, alchemy, and wisdom.

 

The modern use of the caduceus as a symbol of medicine became established in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century as a result of well-documented mistakes, misunderstandings of symbology and classical culture.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

 

The correct symbol for medicine is the Rod of Asclepius, which has only one snake and no wings.