>This was in notables last night but BO removed it.
Liar
The inconsistent logic of the dialectic.
It must necessarily contradict its own constraints of how all thought is allegedly derived, for if thought is derived from class conflict' interest, how can THAT thought which is a thought, suddenly become an objectively true and not just class derived thought?
Karl Marx attacked those philosophers who realized there is a commonality in the logic of the human mind. Anon speculates that the reason for this is that if it wasn't smeared and attacked, then it would be the single reality that collapses the entire Marxist and all other iterations of dialectic that divides humanity into the self-alienated categories of the perceiver.
Marx claimed "production forces", which e can define as 'technology'…ARRIVES OUT OF NOWHERE and determines human thought. But the truth of course is that technology IS ITSELF sourced from the human mind. Technology is the crystallization of ideas into material form.
Does this relate to how school shootings are portrayed by the dialectic fake news?
Anon posits yes.
Patterns in the fake news MINIMIZE personal responsibility for one's thoughts, and MAXIMIZE the 'conflict between groups' angle that EXCUSES the shootings as caused by 'material' 'conflicts' that are 'manifested' by 'false ideologies'…like defending oneself from violence with arms. That's the 'fault' for demented individuals with health problems who are groomed and guided to become killer's by 'therapists'.
The same reason Marx did not 'blame' individuals for their actions but blamed the world which is to be subjugated by and answerable to the very source of the ideological division narrative, is the same reason fake news is deflecting from the school shooter's mind and towards the 'American public mind' of 2nd amendment and the country, for that is their real target to destroy, the school shooters are the excuse.
Anon sees same pattern in how the radical left contradicts itself on the idea of information.
The radical left dialectic logic seeks a 'complete' system of power and control over reality but in so doing necessarily output inconsistent statements such as "all human thought is determined by group conflict" and "our thoughts are not determined by group conflict, our thoughts are the final objective truth of reality".
Yes, agreed, Anon understated it.
The radical left dialectic logic is to promote all sets of opposites as inherent in the structure of all reality (except of course themselves who can transcend that determinism and 'synthesize' all opposites/'conflicts' that they themselves push and project).
It's a logic that excuses ALL practical activity, because inconsistent logic systems, just one set of two inconsistent statements if presented as True, that system necessarily outputs ALL statements as True. And False!
So whatever can assist in one mind dominating another, truth or lies, is justified activity.
"Perhaps he was tired of seeing how certain races/countries were being constantly abused and kept in need/poor/and suffering all for a specific purpose."
"Developingtheir material production and mutual material relations"
This is driven by consciousness, by ideas. Whole Marxist system collapses as self contradictory.
Anon agrees with the statement that Marxism is not an accurate description of reality, but Anon disagrees with the statement that the dialectic logic inherent in Marxism is not motivating the actions of the entire radical left narrative.
Yes, because the former divides a country's people and weakens them for invasion, the latter unites a country's people and strengthens it against invasion.
Dialectic logic contradictions for thee, 'synthesis' control for me.
I was 'shocked' my thesis on how to manipulate minds that had no inner consistency to rebuke self-alienated actors who would seek to use it.