>>1636020 (LB)
This hypothesis is testable. Does the pattern extend into the past?
>>1636020 (LB)
This hypothesis is testable. Does the pattern extend into the past?
If so, she has a lot of penance to do. Look at the symbology in her Christmas cards.
But she has seen the light..her knowledge could be useful.
I'm not convinced there is anything to it.
They seem to be mapping days of posts to other posts made on past days based on this clock pattern. This means that there will be a 1-in-60 chance of any two given posts being "connected". There are 1439 posts now. So any given day will have 1439 / 60 = 23.98 , on average, posts connected to it. There are many recurring themes in Q's body of work. So what is the probability of finding connection within the Q-Clock just be pure chance? Pretty good. And what are the chances that any given days current events might match-up with with a past post via Q-Clock mapping? Near certain.
This is why I insist on seeing a testable hypothesis and successful predictions before I get onboard with it.
[d]ay [of] [d]ays == D of D = Department of Defense.
KEK!
Wats it sayin?
Imagine people 10 years from now looking back at these pictures knowing what they'll know then.
Please, sir, stop feeding the trolls.