Anonymous ID: ef156e May 30, 2022, 9:20 a.m. No.16368719   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8726 >>8749 >>8778

>>16368696

>This is about the Vatican Research thread being resurrected, Anon.

No kike, it's about there being 2 sets of rules on Q research, one for Jews and one for Non-Jews. Enjoy it. This is the new norm on Q Research, a new book every day.

 

The Battle for Press Control 155

Their assigned reason was that the "Herald" was showing animosity

against the Jews. The real purpose of their action _was to crush an

American newspaper owner who dared to be independent of them.

The blow they delivered was a staggering one. It meant the loss of

600,000 dollars a year. Any other newspaper in New York would have

been put out of business by it. The Jews knew that and sat back, waiting

for the downfall of the man they chose to consider as their enemy.

But Bennett was a fighter. Besides, he knew the Jewish psychology

probably better than any other non-Jew in New York. He turned the

tables on his opponents in a startling and unexpected fashion. The

coveted positions in his papers had always been used by the Jews. These

he immediately turned over to non~Jewish merchants under exclusive

contracts. Merchants who had formerly been crowded into the back pages

and obscure comers by the more opulent Jews, now blossomed forth full

page in the most popular spaces. One of the non-Jewish merchants who

took advantage of the new situation was John Wanamaker, whose large

advertisements from that time forward were conspicuous in the Bennett

newspapers. The Bennett papers came out with undiminished circulation

and full advertising pages. The well-planned catastrophe did not then

occur. Instead, there was a rather comical surprise. Here were the non-

Jewish merchantS of America enjoying the choicest service of a valuable

advertising medium, while the Jewish merchants were unrepresented.

Unable to stand the spectacle of trade being diverted to non-Jewish

merchants, the Jews came back to Bennett, requesting the use of his

columns for advertising. The "boycott" had been hardest on the

boycotters. Bennett received all who came, displaying no rancor. They

wanted their old their positions back but Bennett said, No. They argued,

but Bennett said, No. They offered more money, but Bennett said, No.

The choice positions had been forfeited.

Bennett triumphed, but it proved a costly victory. All the time

Bennett was resisting them, the Jews were growing more powerful in ·

New York, and they were obsessed by the idea that to control journalism

in New York meant to control the thought of the whole country.

The number of newspapers gradually diminished through

combinations of publications. 'Adolph S. Ochs, a Philadelphia Jew,

acquired the "New York Times." He soon made it into a great

newspaper, but one whose bias is to serve the Jews. It is the quality of