Anon, what is the date Michael Steinbach is suppose to testify? Thought it was 3rd week of June.
Oh Shit you guys. This is huge. June 10, 2017 COmey had already been fired and Mueller had already been assigned SC. Strzok said he still hadn't talked to the former D. As in former Director Comey on "how to handle" this
Also notice McCabe was going to a black tie affair for Mueller.
BTW: FB_ doesn't use SS code names. R is for RR
The why is Mueller pushing so hard for Potus to testify? Why are the charges against Papadoodoo and Flynn lies?
All is speculation at this point. Normally, I would agree that Dems are forced to accept the results from RM and RR. But these aren't normal times. They will turn on those 2 if they don't get their desired results.
But the incident with RR and PR did in fact happen. A member of Congress who witnessed it confirmed it on Fox, leaving out the threat part.
we know about Mueller still pushing to interview Potus because of the leaked papers Potus atty's sent to Mueller back in Jan. Did you read them? Clearly shows ven though Mueller has already been given that information, he is still pushing for it. Even to this day. There is absolutely no obstruction. There can't be. Yet, Mueller still wants to interview Potus. Why???
Flynn is not the total innocent we want to believe he is. He's done some questionable things. I don't believe he is Mueller's assistant for one second. Mueller (and this is his MO) is trying to strong arm Flynn and Papadope into saying something against Potus. Mueller even threaten to charge Flynn's son with a crime. Flynn didn't commit any crimes. Yet the charge against him are real.
I believe Mueller is total black hat. He is in search of a crime. His only option left is to catch Potus in a lie. Which is why he was an interview. Potus can not threaten Mueller to expose him if he cooperates. That's called blackmail.
You're talking about 2 different things anon. Everyone has said Potus is not being investigated. That's not even in the equation. First, you can not investigate a sitting President for a crime. Period.
But the incident with RR threatening to throw the whole weight of his office against PR and members of that cmte are real. It wasn't publicized so no reason to fake it. Very few people even know about it.
Remember, hen Potus first took office, RR recommended Potus fire Comey. RR convinced Sessions to recuse. Knowing Potus was going to fire Comey, RR pressed forward with getting a SC to "investigate" made up theories. Hired Comey's best friend Mueller and gave him authorization to go search for a crime. Totally unconstitutional.
Oh and Mueller invited McCabe to a black tie event Mueller was in.
haha…listen, if you want to take a crumb that actually has nothing to do with whether Mueller is good or bad and ignore all other evidence, more power to you. I look for all the evidence. Mueller is crook AF. As far as those leaks go? They are coming out of Mueller's office. Like clock work. Freedom Watch filed a lawsuit against the DOJ last year because of it. You should read it some time. Might open your eyes a bit.
One more thing, because you think you are right and I am wrong, you want me to re-read crumbs and trust the plan. Which is quite funny onsidering ou are most likely wrong.
If you don't have anything nice to say, then just STFU.
which post anon?
What makes you think I have never read it?
Answer me this.
Do the Marines have brigs?
Do the Marines have JAG?
Why?
I did not criticize anyone for their POV on Mueller, until I was criticized first. I merely pointed out facts. What anons choose to believe is up to them. Not one of us knows the truth at this point, so telling someone they need to re-read the crumbs or whatever is condescending. You have a 50/50 chance at being right. But so do I. Accusing me of either forgetting the crumbs or not caring is just wrong. Neither have I used you for a punching bag. And just so you know, I was also here when Q dropped those crumbs and the lengthy discussions about once a Marine….
He left the Corp almost 50yrs ago. He's been crooked AF the entire time he's been in DC, from before 9/11. If you want to discount all that, it's certainly your choice. But you are wrong for putting other anons down for not agreeing with you.
I'm done.