Sussmann's aquittal will embolden others (trap?)
Durham has laid out his prosecutorial agenda (Hillary added per testimony?)
The evidence of a "group conspiracy" at Sussmann's trial is moot becaus of aquittal?
Durham needs a conviction to prove his group conspiracy allegations
Anon is still comfy, but would like a lawfag to chime in
Even Tom Fitton is appalled
it was a jury trial though, not a trial by judge
just looking at all the angles, not disputing
the testimony at congress was legit (Kash Patel) and contradicted the trial evidence
much respect to the white hat lawyers
it didn't really protect the FBI, if anything, it implicated them in the conspiracy (albeit, there was no conviction of Sussmann, so evidence is moot?)
this is the level of retardation anon tries to avoid daily