[:58] mins & date checked out with the clock. Not the complete timestamp.
Went through all breads, but this clock-image in the Q-ARMY post, which had the clock in the background showing the exact time of the q post (15:58:04 EDT), and the q post in the foreground, I wasn't able to find it.
Q posted 15:58:29 (EDT), of course, but the clock in the Q-ARMY post had the time 15:58:04 shown.
Would also be cool not to call them "predictions" but rather possibilities or things to possibly happen. We don't know which Q post was meant for which day on a single "ray" (i.e. day). So for example, Q's last post could be meant to have significance on Aug, 2 (i.e. the next cycle) only.
Hahaha, sure enough, because you say it, master. Why not ask the BO/BV to ban posters, if they're violating your rule ?
Hey friendo – you should really do what the anon said, and relax a little >>1638510
Seems like you're unable to work with an hypothesis without being served the "truth", so that you can easily swallow it without having to chew a bit or think …. Go right ahaead sir, but don't think anons (and Q-team) are not seeing what you're doing here.