Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:19 a.m. No.1638493   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8509 >>8526

>>1638489

ugh you again, still with this.

you are just as well told to go off to the hall monitor thread, here, this one's all yours:

>>1119245 – TTDDTOT - Things That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread

Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:23 a.m. No.1638512   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8520

>>1638504

look at your replies, already.

and you say the clock is the slide?

 

you're just like the antinasim shitters: if you'd just let it be, the posts would go by, but no, you have to make a fuss…

Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:34 a.m. No.1638565   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8569

>>1638526

>Please don't forget the personal attacks, though. I wouldn't have it any other way.

oh, we can see that… any critical comments of THE CONTENT AND FREQUENCY OF YOUR POSTS is decried falsely as "Ad Hominem", regardless of the nature of the criticism.

But do go on, show yourself more.

Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:41 a.m. No.1638610   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1638596

>Nothing here has changed but the spotlight placed on the city by mainstream media.

very interesting, thanks.

 

(it could be kekworthy to meme Hogg's "white privilege", using their logic against them, but beyond hogged out myself, so not for me)

Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:46 a.m. No.1638643   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1638602

that's fine. attacks come from all sides, need thick skin and solid insides.

 

understand there's been constant shilly bitching about the clock: regardless of anyone's opinion on it, being so new you think it can be worth anyone's time trying to herd anons away from it is embarrassing…

 

but when i asked such questions, i've had the luck of having decent, patient clockanons answer. Still not sold on it 100% at all, but if we can deal with weeks of anons analyzing the "hidden" data in litteral black blank spaces, we can deal with dem Qlocks

Anonymous ID: 91219f June 5, 2018, 6:50 a.m. No.1638669   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1638655

>attacks slidecunts cunt-y suspect slideattack feckless cunts.

and it complains of "Ad Hominems"

 

>>1638526

>Please don't forget the personal attacks, though. I wouldn't have it any other way.

oh, we can see that… any critical comments of THE CONTENT AND FREQUENCY OF YOUR POSTS is decried falsely as "Ad Hominem", regardless of the nature of the criticism.

But do go on, show yourself more.