>>>16384870 (You) (lb)
>
>king and khan mean same thing,
>
>ruler
means the same thing, but the point is, king is an Indo-European (Germanic) word, Mongols, tatars or turkish tribes didn't speak indoeuro languages, the words king and khan are not etymologically related "cognates" like caesar, kaiser, czar and shah, get it?
I remember having read that the Sicariis also did forced circumcisions … but it seem not to be clear if the Romans tried to ban the custom and if that then caused the Jewish rebellion … the Circumcision Anon should digg that instead of spamming the same dumb shit time time again
>>>16384946 (You)
>
>That's what you were taught but it's false.
>
>Russian is most close to Sanskrt, though that is denied it is verified by speakers of both.
>
>there's always reasons for their lies.
>
>Check out the work of astrophysicist, mathematican, logicain and statistics expert, Historian.. Anatoly Fomenko.
>
>His work and the work of his team, co-researchers solved many previously unsolved mysteries of history.
What, Russian is an Indo-European language, Czar comes from the same root as Caesar and Shah, that's what I said. but closest to Sanskrit, never heard of that. I've read Fomenko, but it's too far out, and some of his arguments and methods are ridiculous, impossible to believe in it