Imagine being so retarded to direct more attention to what one said is retarded.
Imagine being so triggered at the 'untouchables' getting called out as sick bastards, that you felt the need to rant and rave on an anonymous forum.
KMAO
You triggered loser.
You're clearly coping very poorly with the fact the nwo can no longer operate in the shadows.
And you're here trying to find relief and catharsis by projecting your own anxiety and 'imagining' it in the minds of others, as a hollow means to elevate your own fragile ego.
Your shit doesn't work here.
I can see you're REALLY triggered, imagining enemy armies where everyone is grouped into age bins, so that you don't have to use ratiocination, just 'iDeNtiFy', without any evidence, the background of the author, as if that even constitutes an intelligent argument.
You're creating your own put of despair and agony.
Cope harder bro.
When does an Anon go from one age bin to another?
You can't hide behind 'LGBT', groomer.
That guy's MINDSET WANTS TO DOMINATE THE CONVERSATION BY DEMANDING TO 'CONTROL' THE WHOLE IDEA OF 'TRUTH'.
"How is "truth" condescending?"
Brain scrambling…PROJECTS OWN PSYCHOLOGY and dialectically inverts the obligation to reconcile, by baiting the speaker into providing a statement to replace the statements of WHY the guy thinks truth is 'transphobic'.
Narcissistic projection and smearing as guilty to replace ANSWERING A SIMPLE QUESTION OF HOW THE WORD 'TRUTH' IS "insulting and condescending."
"You're walking on thin ice you have about 30 seconds before I get up"
THAT IS ITSELF CONDESCENDING AND INSULTING
This is what worshiping symbolism OVER physical reality results in.
Words are weaponized.
The guy claiming 'the word truth is condescending and insulting' is trying to impose his own imagined definition of truth, a warped definition, then project that meaning onto the guy speaking the word as if he is being what the accuser smeared him as being.
The guy claiming 'truth is condescending' IS ELEVATING HIMSELF AND CONDESCENDING THE QUESTIONER.
This
Anti Groomer is not anti LGBT, groomer
Exactly, he's projecting his own beliefs as absolute truth, nobody else is allowed to speak the word truth lest they 'conflict' with his own inherently conflict based logic definition of the word where he knows the truth of things (such as the word truth used by others as necessarily being condescending).
By his own inconsistent logic he is claiming his statements as truth and not truth at the same time.
This is what the dialectic logic looks like in conversation.
The dialectic logic mind will demand to 'control' both sides of a dialectic set, with one projected onto the other guy, "you said the word 'truth', therefore one side of my inconsistent dialectic thought is now your thought, and I also control my thought on what I think the truth of the word truth means that you're supposed to obey as well".
Nowhere in the guy's accusations is he even recognizing the speaker as an individual human being who just like everyone else, INCLUDING THE ACCUSER is depending on SOME axioms and methods to even make any claims to truth about the word truth in the first place.
The way to nullify these accuser's projections is to describe everything they are accusing of you, as their own psychology that has nothing to do with the speaker.
Narcissists get scared and lost as that happens because they need and depend on trusting compassionate victims to obey their dialectic logic (you're anti X, whereas I am pro X, I win".
Kari Lake is attacked because she never publicly condemned the fake news' own symbolism straw man 'Qanon'.
"DIRECT ENGAGEMENT WITH RUSSIA IS NOT DIRECT ENGAGEMWNT WITH RUSSIA."
PEDOS TRYING TO USE LGBT AS HUMAN SHIELDS SO THAT ANTI-PEDO IS FALSELY ASSOCIATED WITH ANTI-'VICTIM GROUP'
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
WE SEE YOU ALL
>I refer to a non-existent set and present that as a flaw of Kari Lake.
Everyone on planet Earth no matter what actions they do take, will logically presuppose a set of actions NOT taken.
Why aren't you looking at what actions and statements Kari Lake IS making?
That isn't why he's not attending
>Obama started this.
Non, he accelerated it.
The proximate 'start' is the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School of philosophy that eschews (always without actual refutation of) rationalism that unites words and actions/being, and treats words as floating in this air totally disconnected to ontological reality, and so "If I have the thought that I am an apache helicopter, then I can identify as one and anyone who questions that is a bigot and hater".
Of course they don't directly include apache attack helicopters in their list of 'approved' categories to divide people, they are predominantly racist and sexist more than anything else, so the narrative from that school takes the form of mental thoughts of 'trans..itioning' the physical body to change, never escaping physical reality, so it LOOKS grotesque and has body mutilation, like genitals getting chopped off, liquid sacks being rammed under the skin to make protruding shapes, wearing outlandish makeup and doing all sorts of ritualistic activity to 'synthesize' the 'conflict' between idea of self and physical self.
It's a philosophy that apologizes for and encourages mental disorders.