>>1637869 (#2060)
<i guess we'll see Q^^^^^^
>If it's a positive meeting I love it (nohomo implied) if it's a negative meeting I'm not happy, and it could very well be positive
https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1002627625909616642
@7:30
>>1637869 (#2060)
<i guess we'll see Q^^^^^^
>If it's a positive meeting I love it (nohomo implied) if it's a negative meeting I'm not happy, and it could very well be positive
https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1002627625909616642
@7:30