Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 7:52 a.m. No.1639043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9051 >>9106

>>1638977

 

Pretty much agree with you on how to red pill, anon and that the clocks should not be used for predictions. However, the clocks can def be used to confirm Q. Too many proofs to say otherwise.

 

To date, I have not seen anyone make a prediction on future events. That's one thing we need to guard against. "Future proves past". That's all we should be doing is confirming Q's drops of future events, once they happen.

Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 8:03 a.m. No.1639118   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1639051

 

For the most part, yes. But you know how some anons are. They will take it and try to guess when such and such an event will take place. It's natural to want to do that because the not knowing sucks balls.

 

Everyone that says Q/Potus won't predict their plans ahead of time are correct, they won't. We need to make sure to discourage anyone from doing so

Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 8:10 a.m. No.1639160   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1639106

 

I disagree with you anon, but don't want to argue with you. The times Q posted something in a [ ], it lined up with what it should. But that's the items I myself have confirmed. Watching what anons have tried to do for last 3 days is where the problem comes in. Many are trying to hard to make something fit and it doesn't. That does not mean the clock is inaccurate. Simply means anons are not doing it right.

 

As for predictions, 100% agree. The clock should not be used for predictions. It should only be used to confirmed Q by showing events were foretold by Q.

Predictions are not the purpose of the clock. That's what needs to be called out. The clock is useful for confirmation, not predictions, IMHO.

 

If you disagree with me, that's ok too.

Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 8:28 a.m. No.1639290   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1639196

 

True, if it's taken the wrong way. That's bad on the anon who took it to twitter without first stating the clock is used for confirmations. Should never be used for predictions. Ever.

Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 8:36 a.m. No.1639344   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9354

>>1639303

 

Yeah, which is exactly what you are doing. Randomly adding or subtracting time is not how the clock should work, but hey…if you want to continue giving the clock a bad rep, go for it.

 

>>1639314

 

Have you even read any of my post on this bread? I would say no based on your comments. Why do you stop being a fucking idiot and learn something before you type to show your ignorance.

Anonymous ID: 63486b June 5, 2018, 8:44 a.m. No.1639419   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1639354

 

I knew you would say something like that. Are you this hateful in rl or just here where the keyboard protects you? Don't like to be shown for an idiot, do ya? HA.