Anonymous ID: 803705 June 5, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.1640354   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0634

>>1640146 (LB)

 

>Horowitz - Senate Judiciary Committee

Byron York of the Washington Examiner reported the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the IG report has been moved to June 11.

 

Byron York

@ByronYork

Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report, originally scheduled for June 5, has been moved to June 11. That means no IG report this week.

 

4:04 PM - May 31, 2018

2,806

2,890 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Last Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary announced Chairman Chuck Grassley will be holding a hearing entitled: “Examining the Inspector General’s First Report on the Justice Department’s Decisions Regarding the 2016 Presidential Election.”

Anonymous ID: 803705 June 5, 2018, 10:45 a.m. No.1640381   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1640269

it also keeps 12 Socialost Senators in danger of losing their seats either in DC for Votes or having to answer for way they aren't their to Red State citezens

Anonymous ID: 803705 June 5, 2018, 11:03 a.m. No.1640544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0570 >>0594 >>0946

Facebook ‘Data Sharing’ Could Make

Cambridge Analytica Look Small

 

‘Data Sharing’ Could Make Cambridge Analytica Look Small

By Jack Davis

June 4, 2018 at 6:52am

Share Tweet Email Print

A major online privacy scandal is brewing amid a new report claiming Facebook gave personal information its users thought was private to a wide range of companies that make electronic devices.

 

Facebook “formed data-sharing partnerships” with 60 companies including Apple, Amazon, BlackBerry, Microsoft and Samsung, The New York Times reported Sunday.

 

“It’s like having door locks installed, only to find out that the locksmith also gave keys to all of his friends so they can come in and rifle through your stuff without having to ask you for permission,” said Ashkan Soltani, a research and privacy consultant who used to serve as chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission.

 

Facebook, however, said neither it nor the companies with which it formed partnerships did anything wrong.

 

In a post on Facebook’s blog, the company’s vice president of product partnerships reiterated the social media giant’s stance that the device-integrated application programming interfaces were controlled tightly.

 

“Partners could not integrate the user’s Facebook features with their devices without the user’s permission. And our partnership and engineering teams approved the Facebook experiences these companies built,” Ime Archibong, a Facebook vice president, wrote on the company’s blog.

 

Archibong said the partnerships had limited access and only allowed companies to see how Facebook worked on the devices they were building.

 

“These partners signed agreements that prevented people’s Facebook information from being used for any other purpose than to recreate Facebook-like experiences,” he wrote.

 

“We are not aware of any abuse by these companies,” Archibong added.