Anonymous ID: 08a1ac June 8, 2022, 6:45 a.m. No.16413942   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3947 >>3954 >>4348 >>4494 >>4556

>>16413903

anons

archive the fake news pushing this green converse lie before they change it

oh Camila just added the heart in solidarity.

 

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5018491/matthew-mcconaughey-shows-converse-shoes-uvalde-mass-shooting-victims

 

June 7, 2022 | Clip Of White House Daily Briefing

Matthew McConaughey Shows Converse Shoes of One of Uvalde Mass Shooting Victims

 

Actor and Uvalde native Matthew McConaugheyshows the green Converse shoes Maite Rodriguez was wearing when she was killed along with 18 other children and two teachers at her elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, last month. "Maite wore green high top converse with a heart she had hand drawn on the right toe because it represented her love of nature…These are the same green converse on her feetthat turned out to be the only clear evidence that could identify her after the shooting," he says of the the young girl who wanted to grow up to be a marine biologist. close

Anonymous ID: 08a1ac June 8, 2022, 8:47 a.m. No.16414483   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4534

06-08-22 Geoff Shepard on Warroom

talkingWatergate

4 caches of documents from watergate only revealed in the last 8 years.

secret meetings between prosecutors and judges.

leon Jawarski took files with him.

surfaced in 2013.

Assoc Spec. Pros took his papers.

They didn't surface until 2015.

Phil lackavara, dumped boxes of files on the archives in 2020.

Anons should watch this segment.

 

>06-08

<08-06

 

08-06-2018 Q1822 Watergate X1000

 

1822

Q !A6yxsPKia. 08/06/2018 19:31:41 ID:

8chan/patriotsfight: 121

Q Clock [ Min: 2 | :25/:55 Mir: 48 | 180 Mir: 32 | :35/:05 Mir: 8 ]

Psychological Projection.

Define Conspiracy.

  1. a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

"a conspiracy to destroy the government"

  1. the action of plotting or conspiring.

"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"

[Fake News]

Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?

Fake News ‘KNOWINGLY FALSE’ narrative pushes.

  1. POTUS colluded w/ Russia to win the 2016 Presidential election

  2. POTUS is puppet to PUTIN

  3. POTUS to irreparably harm relationships w/ our allies

  4. POTUS will collapse U.S. economy

  5. POTUS will collapse stock market

  6. POTUS will cause war w/ NK

  7. POTUS will cause war w/ IRAN

  8. POTUS will destroy the world.

  9. On and on……..(knowingly false)

FEAR & SCARE PUSH.

They would rather see NK peace negotiations fail (WAR!) than see POTUS resolve.

Scandalous Media Bias?

Conspiracy?

Collaboration?

What are they hiding?

FAKE NEWS MEDIA IS NOT FREE AND INDEPENDENT.

FAKE NEWS MEDIA = PROPAGANDA ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Think WL list of journalists who colluded w/ HRC/DNC (2016 Pres election).

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED by RACE.

DIVIDED by RELIGION.

DIVIDED by CULTURE.

DIVIDED by CLASS.

DIVIDED by POLITICAL AFFILIATION.

DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.

TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.

YOU, THE PEOPLE, HAVE THE POWER.

This movement challenges their ‘forced’ narrative.

This movement challenges people to not simply trust what is being reported.

Research for yourself.

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

This movement is not about one person or a group of people.

WE, THE PEOPLE.

You are witnessing a FULL PANIC ATTACK by the FAKE NEWS MEDIA & COVERT ALT MEDIA AFFILIATES (foreign gov’t).

They cannot contain or defeat what they do not understand.

Is any of this normal?

Think sealed indictments count.

Think resignations of CEOs.

Think resignations of Senators.

Think resignations of Congress.

Think termination of sr FBI…

Think termination of sr DOJ…

WATERGATE X1000

Attacks will only intensify.

Logical thinking.

Ask yourself a simple question – WHY????

Q

Anonymous ID: 08a1ac June 8, 2022, 8:54 a.m. No.16414534   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4596

>>16414483

>WE, THE PEOPLE.

>You are witnessing a FULL PANIC ATTACK by the FAKE NEWS MEDIA & COVERT ALT MEDIA AFFILIATES (foreign gov’t).

>They cannot contain or defeat what they do not understand.

>Is any of this normal?

>Think sealed indictments count.

>Think resignations of CEOs.

>Think resignations of Senators.

>Think resignations of Congress.

>Think termination of sr FBI…

>Think termination of sr DOJ…

>WATERGATE X1000

>Attacks will only intensify.

>Logical thinking.

>Ask yourself a simple question – WHY????

>Q

 

< https://watergate.info/analysis/geoff-shepard

 

Geoff Shepard: An Alternative View Of Watergate

 

As a member of President Nixon’s Watergate defense team, Geoff Shepard holds alternative views of events and how they unfolded during the Watergate scandal.

 

In essence,he argues that once the scandal investigations had become highly politicized, through creation of the Senate Watergate Committee and the Office of the Special Prosecutor, two major injustices followed:

 

First, that the scandal itself was skillfully exploited by President Nixon’s political opponents who were far more interested in destroying the Republican party in advance of the 1976 presidential election than in punishing actual wrongdoing.

 

It was the career prosecutors who had broken the cover-up, but they were quickly removed from the case by Archibald Cox, the newly appointed Special Prosecutor. His office then postponed the pending indictments for ten months, while they launched unrelated investigations into every aspect of the Nixon presidency, sent FBI and IRS agents to interview over 120 major Republican contributors, and developed background information on every potential GOP presidential candidate, including President Gerald Ford, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, Vice Presidential nominee Senator Robert Dole, and California Governor Ronald Reagan.

 

Shepard’s views are set out in his 2008 book, The Secret Plot to Make Ted Kennedy President, Inside the Real Watergate Scandal, and his related presentation at the Nixon Library of June 24. 2008.

 

Watch Shepard at the Nixon Library (June 24, 2008)

 

Second, Shepard argues that the trial of the Watergate cover-up case involved judicial and prosecutorial abuse of such magnitude that the resulting guilty verdicts may have to be vacated.

 

He maintains that the real culprits who had been orchestrating the cover-up were let off relatively Scot-free in exchange for their questionable testimony against Nixon and his top three aides, Bob Haldeman, John Ehrlichman and John Mitchell.

 

Shepard is currently writing a book about the cover-up trial, but many of his points can be seen in his February 9, 2012 presentation at the Nixon Library entitled, “Due Process and the Watergate Trials, Did Politics Trump the Rule of Law?”

 

Watch Shepard at the Nixon Foundation (February 9, 2012)

 

Shepard also outlined his view in article on The Atlantic website on August 8, 2013, entitled “Leon Jaworski’s Telltale Memos“, which details four secret ex parte meetings between trial judge John Sirica and Special Prosecutor Jaworski.

 

Access to all of Shepard’s essays, presentations, and other Watergate materials – including an extensively-detailed Watergate chronology – is available from his website

Anonymous ID: 08a1ac June 8, 2022, 9:07 a.m. No.16414596   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4608

>>16414534

>Shepard also outlined his view in article on The Atlantic website on August 8, 2013, entitled “Leon Jaworski’s Telltale Memos“, which details four secret ex parte meetings between trial judge John Sirica and Special Prosecutor Jaworski.

 

<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/08/the-watergate-cover-up-trial-justice-denied/278522/

 

The Watergate Cover-Up Trial: Justice Denied?

There were real crimes and real criminals. But newly found documents suggest a denial of due process of law to the defendants, a move that did the Constitution no favors.

By Geoff Shepard

 

Watergate remains the greatest political scandal in modern American history. It culminated not only in President Nixon’s announcement of his resignation, 39 years ago Thursday, but in the conviction and imprisonment of his three most senior aides. Attorney General John Mitchell, White House Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, and Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman were found guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury in the three-month Watergate cover-up trial, which ended on January 1, 1975.

 

I saw it all unfold. I was a young lawyer working on the White House staff and assisting in Nixon’s defense efforts. It is true that we failed spectacularly. Of course, I’m disappointed we weren’t more successful. But whether the defendants were innocent or guilty, I’ve always worried on a more basic level that the heightened emotions of the times denied them the due process of law envisioned by our Constitution.

 

As a result of some recent discoveries I made while researching a book on the Watergate trials, my concern has been vindicated. It turns out that the notion that “no man is above the law” somehow didn’t apply to judges or prosecutors involved in the cover-up trial. Documents I have uncovered indicate that the efforts to punish the wrongdoings of Watergate led to further wrongdoing by the very officials given the task of bringing the Watergate defendants to justice.

 

The new documents suggestthat defendants in the Watergate cover-up trial, held before Judge John Sirica, received anything but a fair trial. Indeed, they suggestprosecutorial and judicial misconduct so serious secret meetings, secret documents, secret collusion that their disclosure at the time either would have prevented Sirica from presiding over the trial or would have resulted in the reversal of the convictions and the cases being remanded for new trials.