>>16417691 (LB)
>>16417688 (LB)
Just wondering.. What if someone really did start throwing a trip code out there and at least muddying the waters enough by impersonating Q and contriving some narrative about new trip… to the extent that it forced a legit Q to return? That'd be interesting.. Where are the big $ attempts to impersonate Q and hijack the whole thing…
B-B-B-B-B-B-B-Boomoomoomoomoomoomoom
B-B-B-B-B-B-B-Boomoomoomoomoomoomoom
B-B-B-B-B-B-B-Boomoomoomoomoomoomoom
IDK, i've just never seen a sincere attempt.. I saw the B thing 2ish years ago, but.. that was super short-lived and there weren't any "B proofs".. kek. it was just a cryptic blurb that anyone could pull off.. why no fed attempt to shill the void and misdirect during Q absence?.
red pill'n has always involved shoop
I do, that's what I'm saying.. I would expect worse, frankly.. I'm surprised that politicians and news media are now slippin chanspeak into their analysis.. so much influence.. yet there's no $200 zuck buck fake Q floatin around.. would think there would be.
Do they just have a couple doubles when its time to speak and otherwise cockily parade the real post-lobotomy bill around?