>his statement is not true.
>Q replied directly to a post describing the use of a "circular flow diagram".
Notice how this shill did not actually engage the statement that Q never directly linked to any help instance of the clown clock meme, but references its own 'interpretation' of a historical statement as also itself a linking from Q.
The statement is true. Nowhere did Q link to any instance of that clown clock meme. Shill did not disprove that. Shill referencing own ass output as Q's output.
You can't point to your own interpretation of 'circular flow diagram' as proof Q validated the clown clock interpretation specifically. There is no unique mapping from circular flow diagram to this clown clock that has GARBAGE logic.
You can't go back in time.
>Q replied directly to a post describing the use of a "circular flow diagram"
That is not Q replying to any clown clock INTERPRETATION of what 'circular flow diagram' even means.
You can't point to your own interpretation of what that means, to 'prove' Q linked to it after. That makes no logical sense. What is needed is Q drop that LINKED A SINGLE CLOWN CLOCK MEME OR A SINGLE CLOWN CLOCK CLAIM.
NOWHERE DID Q EVER DO THIS.
>To distract you from what.
From reality as it is.