dChan
Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 26, 2022, 5:45 p.m. No.16531778   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2922 >>9044

>>16501774

>>16502330

Thanks for posting Gavin’s vids et al. Agree ground is not wet in earlier NYE, then raining around midnight.

Based on that, disregard any EMB and WW exclusions.

I would still say that the PICCADILLY and RED BUS dates mentioned are not based on lingering damp conditions but are rather based on the fact that our suspected times when those pics were taken (RED BUS in afternoon and PICCADILLY at or near sunset which was approx 3:50pm) are bracketed during hours of measured rain. Not after, but during hours of rain.

 

What about the WW bulbs and rain and closed dates? Did anon want to make a summary report on that digs results for possibly excluded dates? To include dates bulbs are decidedly not matched to the Wild Maus pic, missing light bars, etc.

Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 26, 2022, 8:12 p.m. No.16532922   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5567 >>9046

>>16531778

I thought I would post my reasons for concluding the RED BUS pic was afternoon, close to sunset. Showing Suncalc simulations for beginning and end of December 2013.

For the RED BUS to cast a shadow in its front the sun would need to be behind the bus. The shadow cast by a child’s leg on pavement may show this. There is also what may be a slight shadow cast by the bus stop sign in the same direction as the bus shadow. My guess is this must be around 3:35pm to get the best angle of the sun to match.

Coincidentally, this would place the RED BUS pic, IF it occurred the same day as the PICCADILLY pics, as occurring 10 or 15 minutes before the PICCADILLY pics. (Time to walk from the bus stop to Piccadilly mebbe?)

And a gentle reminder- the PICCADILLY pics show some street lamps coming on. And sunset in December is around 3:50pm. Not dusk/dark, but that time at sunset when the skies are darkening.

Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 27, 2022, 7:27 a.m. No.16536063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6141 >>6278 >>7990

>>16535567

I believe it’s posture shows that it is under double tension from two separate wires. See the quite a few close up pics anon has for reference. I believe the device would hang down if not supporting wires attached to it because I suspect that inside the black shape is actually chain that is covered by rubber tubing.

Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 27, 2022, 9:08 a.m. No.16536696   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6753 >>7990

>>16536141

>Noice.

>Well-archived, too.

I believe (you) were the original archivist. I just saved the pics you originally posted.

 

>>16536278

It’s my believe from looking at different perspectives of the device in different pics that the ‘shape’ of the device is close to what you have shown but is actually ring of chain with attachments at the 12-3-6-9 o’clock positions. It is quite ingenious in that it behaves like a U-joint or universal joint, allowing this one device to attach to wires from an infinite number of angles.

I used your diagram to depict how I would EXPECT to see the device IF left up after the decorations were disconnected from it.

On that subject, I have another reason for thinking the decoration wires are up. It is this. As we have seen photo evidence that these devices are not left in place between occasions when decorations are hung. Iirc, it takes no small effort to take the decorations down using motorized ‘cherry pickers’ machinery to reach up there and emplace/remove the decorations suspended across the street.

Why go to the expense of renting the machinery and hiring crews to take the decorations down only to leave the fasteners up? Then to finally remove them some time later, requiring again some device to raise workers to that height to just remove the devices? No, I think it would all be done in one operation. Think economy of effort and expense.

Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 27, 2022, 9:29 a.m. No.16536919   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7013

>>16536278

About the inability to ‘see’ the wires. Even in much closer pics that give us a good view of the attachments it is difficult to make out the wires vs. our grainy pic of an attachment from sidewalk level on the opposite side of the street.

Relatively speaking, am not surprised we are not able to make out the wires.

Anonymous ID: fcd709 June 27, 2022, 10:08 a.m. No.16537157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7817 >>8576 >>9044

>>16536753

>I hear you. But this is government.

 

What makes us think the attachments are not part of the decorations? Remove just the two nuts and the whole of it comes away. They’ve done this thing numerous times. They know the measurements of each wire I’ll wager. Should they drastically change the design of the star or snowflake, they still know how long each wire must be. They may even have means of taking up slack after attachment.