dChan
Anonymous ID: 7a3cc9 June 11, 2022, 3:18 a.m. No.16429637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0156

>>16429616

>New Jersey Consent Decree

DNC v. RNC Consent Decree

In 1982, after caging in predom­in­antly African-Amer­ican and Latino neigh­bor­hoods, the Repub­lican National Commit­tee and New Jersey Repub­lican State Commit­tee entered into a consent decree with their Demo­cratic party coun­ter­parts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Repub­lican party organ­iz­a­tions agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot secur­ity” programs, includ­ing any proposed voter caging.

 

The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Demo­cratic National Commit­tee and Obama for Amer­ica sought to enforce the consent decree, claim­ing that the RNC had not submit­ted alleged ballot secur­ity oper­a­tions for review. After the elec­tion, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substan­tially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC’s motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until Decem­ber 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unan­im­ously rejec­ted the appeal and affirmed the District Court’s decision. A subsequent peti­tion for rehear­ing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certi­or­ari peti­tion to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.

 

On Octo­ber 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had viol­ated the decree. On Novem­ber 5, after abbre­vi­ated discov­ery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided suffi­cient evid­ence of coordin­a­tion between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-secur­ity oper­a­tions, but will allow the DNC to offer further evid­ence after the elec­tion.

 

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree

Anonymous ID: 7a3cc9 June 11, 2022, 5:03 a.m. No.16429800   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16429727

>>16429733

"Just Another Non-Existent Terminal"

Janet, sometimes called Janet Airlines, is the unofficial name given to a highly classified fleet of passenger aircraft operated for the United States Department of the Air Force as an employee shuttle to transport military and contractor employees to Special Access Facilities (SAPF.) Its purpose is to pick up employees at their home airports and take them to their places of work. Then, in the afternoon, they take the employees back to their home airports. The airline mainly serves the Nevada National Security Site (most notably Area 51 and the Tonopah Test Range) from a private terminal at Las Vegas's Harry Reid International Airport.