Anonymous ID: f3991b June 12, 2022, 11:30 a.m. No.16436143   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Dan Scavino was at the WH June 12, 2019, which happens to coincide with a relatively longer period of radio silence from Q.

 

Hmmm, I wonder what was going on at the time.

Anonymous ID: f3991b June 12, 2022, 11:38 a.m. No.16436170   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16435763

Not merely 'playing both sides'.

 

INTRODUCING A MANUFACTURED SET OF TWO 'SIDES' EACH WITH A PRESCRIPTED NARRATIVE.

 

And everyone is to be 'interpreted' as speaking and acting exclusively to 'promote one side' and 'oppress' the other side'.

 

And it's not merely "a" two sided manufactured set of opposites.

 

They keep introducing different two sided sets of opposites as each previous set is echoed in fake news, trusted, 'sublimated' and 'adopted/normalized', from one 'current thing' political expedience to expand power and wealth, to the next.

 

The solution is to stop playing their game, and learn to play the game

Anonymous ID: f3991b June 12, 2022, 12:09 p.m. No.16436285   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6315

>>16436215

Fake news.

 

Step 1: Find source of GP = Daily Beast.

 

Step 2: Go to Daily beast article.https://www.thedailybeast.com/sean-hannity-proposed-hunter-biden-pardon-to-smooth-over-jan-6

 

Step 3: Find 'text' in question:

"One item from that conversation: โ€œHe was intrigued by the pardon idea!! (Hunter)"

 

And that's it. But where is text saying that Hannity PROPOSED Hunter Biden be pardoned by Trump, and where is text indicating the actual pardon proposal?

 

Nowhere to be found, the 'source' is this:

 

A person familiar with the conversationsconfirmed to The Daily Beast that the โ€œHunterโ€ in the text was, in fact, Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden and a longtime target of conservative criticsโ€”Hannity foremost among them.According to the source, Hannity had proposedthat Trump issue a last-minute pardon for Hunter Biden

 

Fake news to divide conservative base by dividing Hannity from MAGA using leaked texts and fake 'interpretations'.

 

NEXT!

Anonymous ID: f3991b June 12, 2022, 12:25 p.m. No.16436349   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6370

>>16436330

>>16436302

This org is structured on the same pattern as Antifa and the ballot harvesting mules, to ensure maximum opacity as to the true financiers and controllers of the org.

 

"Hub and spoke" models are commonly used to HIDE INFORMATION.

 

Using same radical left 'catch phrases' to EXCUSE THEIR OWN DESIRE TO EXCLUDE PRO-AMERICA MOVEMENT.

Anonymous ID: f3991b June 12, 2022, 12:38 p.m. No.16436411   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6459

>>16436372

>They're not lying, just not telling who their financiers are.

Anon saying this is a lie:

 

'We're funded almost entirely by small donations from supporters like you'

 

To be sure, the billionaire controllers of this org likely 'split' the 'donations' into many MANY different supposed 'independent sources' so as to cover up who is controlling it, but to your point, yes, they're completely opaque as to their sponsors and donations. Completely dark. Zero transparency.

 

By what logic is this org to be viewed as anything other than a hostile insurrectionist force introducing hatred and division?

 

Look at how they ask their questions about visitors, its logic is PREDICATED ON A 'NOTION' of conflict and division in the Republic.

 

The same cringe pattern is textbook Soros.