Anonymous ID: eea063 June 12, 2022, 2:12 p.m. No.16436823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6980 >>7114 >>7236 >>7284

Follow the Money, John Money.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Sex_reassignment_of_David_Reimer

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Opinions_on_pedophilia

 

Money participated in debates on chronophilias, especially pedophilia.[40] He stated that both sexual researchers and the public do not make distinctions between affectional pedophilia and sadistic pedophilia. Money asserted that affectional pedophilia was about love and not sex.

 

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual […] then I would not call it pathological in any way.[41][42]

 

Money held the view that affectional pedophilia is caused by a surplus of parental love that became erotic, and is not a behavioral disorder. Rather, he took the position that heterosexuality is another example of a societal and therefore superficial, ideological concept.[41][42]

Anonymous ID: eea063 June 12, 2022, 2:33 p.m. No.16436923   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6933

>>16436884

>>16436888

“A man who has lived in many places is not likely to be deceived by the local errors of his native village; the scholar has lived in many times and is therefore in some degree immune from the great cataract of nonsense that pours from the press and the microphone of his own age.” ~C.S. Lewis