Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 10:13 p.m. No.16438997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16438973

Yeah, I've heard it all before.

No one knows about the Bible, but for you

No one knows about God, but for you

No one knows about the situation, but for you

No one knows about the Nephilim, but for you

No one knows shit around here, but for you.

 

Yet you never explain shit. You just tell people "You can't see" "You don't know." "You're a moron" etcetera. You're a great gif make, though. I'll give you that.

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 10:52 p.m. No.16439118   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9124 >>9295

>>16439100

>Body cam video is public property that must be requested via appropriate channels within your city government

 

>>16439107

>Make a FOIA request.

>They have to honor it.

 

The government doesn't have to give you shit. In Florida, where they have Sunshine laws (a set of laws governing transparency of the government, police, etc), you will get the body cam footage about 100 percent of the time. In other states and especially democrat states, they only readily release that shit when a black gets shot. Even then, it can be tough. The Beetlejuice mayor of Chicago fights like hell to keep bodycam footage of police murders, even blacks, from surfacing.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2022/06/10/chp-paul-pelosi-arrest-footage/

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 10:59 p.m. No.16439147   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9161

>>16439124

Out of curiosity, what does this mean?

>Because when I ask for discovery, and show that the FOIA laws were not followed, the judge favors my requests most of the time.

What advantages do you gain when you show the government didn't follow a public records demand?

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 11:06 p.m. No.16439160   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9186 >>9198

>>16439013

He loves that little Filipino boy almost as much as he loves America. Kek

To be fair, I never see any gay agenda shit on gateway pundit and gateway pundit covered the wrongfully dubbed "don't say gay" bill positively.

>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/breaking-desantis-signs-parental-rights-education-erroneously-branded-dont-say-gay-bill-bashes-hollywood/

Still, Jim loves plowing Filipino boy ass.

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 11:28 p.m. No.16439227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9237 >>9289

>>16439198

You bring up interesting points. I don't know. Homosexuality is not the only sin in the bible though. Like, when you get to judgment hour do you get fewer negative points for being an alcoholic than faggot. What about a philandering husband? Or someone who sleeps with hookers? At the end of the day, where does one draw the line on "supporting" something based on the sins of the person offering the service? Obviously, people shouldn't be faggots, philanderers, alcoholics, or whore mongers, butโ€ฆ people are, andโ€ฆ I don't know.

shrug

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 11:42 p.m. No.16439290   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16439237

Interesting.

I see this verse is not in all versions of the Bible.

I went to mine (King James Version) to see if it was there. It was.

It would seem the meaning of this verse is that those who distress or abuse the poor are the ones who commit the most grievous sin if I'm understanding it correctly.

Interesting stuff, thanks for bringing it to my attention. The story of its omission is a fascinating rabbit hole

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 12, 2022, 11:53 p.m. No.16439321   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9347

>>16439289

While I agree with the overall premise of this article that porn is destructive, its rationale for its definitions of homosexuality (promiscuity) and heterosexuality (monogamy) seems to come out of left field. I mean look at this line:

>A small minority of homosexuals are monogramous and partake in heterosexuality

I mean, dude, what are you talking about?

Again, the overall message is correct, but just redefining terms for the sake of redefining is incoherent.

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 13, 2022, 2:23 a.m. No.16439528   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9552 >>9646

>>16439492

it might've started out with nerds and gamers, but once it became a speculative pool, the big boy financial institutions and central banks bought the lion share of the market and manipulated and adjusted accordingly. This is a from a 2018 article

 

>According to public records of Nordnet trading logs, the two associated firms JP Morgan Securities Ltd., and Morgan Stanley bought roughly 3M euro worth of XBT note shares. Interestingly after the recent regulatory crackdown in China, and the statements from JP Morganโ€™s senior executive Jamie Dimon talking trash about bitcoin, his firm bought the dip on September 15. In fact, out of all the companies on the list, like Goldman Sachs and Barclays, the JP Morgan team of buyers purchased the most XBT notes.

https://news.bitcoin.com/after-the-boss-calls-bitcoin-a-fraud-jp-morgan-buys-the-dip/

 

XBT is Bitcoin if you're unaware. This is what we found out in 2018, who knows how much they were buying before that, and since. It was the biggest speculative bubble since the dotcoms. The big boys were the ones who shot it up to the moon, bought the biggest pie, and now are cashing out. The little man will be the one left holding the bag.

Anonymous ID: 0f2a56 June 13, 2022, 2:39 a.m. No.16439552   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9646

>>16439492

>>16439528

For context on how much bitcoin changed since institutions like Goldman Sachs, Barclays, and JP Morgan began officially investing in bitcoin in 2018. In December 2017 Bitcoin was 12,000 dollars. After the big banks jumped in it skyrocketed all the way up to 68,000 dollars in 2021. Since then they've been liquidating and making money hand over fist.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/happy-12k-bitcoin-prices-break-another-record-in-epic-week