Thank you anon. The differences between the 2 is significant; it's why there are 2 to begin with.
I wonder if he could be promised immunity from federal cases and still be tried without voiding the immunity deal, by a tribunal similar to how you were saying you could be tried in civilian for something federal gave you immunity for?
Almost a parallel construction type set up. If their case is sound, they don't care what he says as long as they can prove it wasn't his TESTIMONY that brought the evidence.
I went to the store today and the cashier ripped up on coupon and threw it at me and screamed NO DEALS!
Love the lawFAGS. Praise kek.
I heard some unsubstantiated story about people high profile people going to a place where evidence (specifically the walnut sauce chair) was shown to them and they were told to carry on and not speak to what was going on.
But as far as anything verifiable? especially from Q? Im going to say negative ghost rider.
p.s. red text? you're not that important.
Yes. We were chosen for a reason.