>>1644366

not it actually says "use" immunity. two kinds of immunity. this is good

Use Immunity

States may adopt the theory of use immunity as the federal government has adopted. Use immunity permits the state or federal government to prosecute the witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness's immunized testimony. The state or federal government is prohibited from derivative use of immunized testimony for the prosecution of the immunized witness. If the state or federal government chooses to prosecute the witness for an offense they must prove that the evidence is based upon an independent and legitimate source. The state or federal government has an affirmative duty to prove that its evidence was derived from a legitimate source independent from the compelled testimony.

Transactional Immunity

The federal government no longer uses this type of immunity, however some states still use this method. Transactional immunity is defined as immunity that protects a witness from prosecution of the offense involved. For example, if the witness testified about participating in a narcotics transaction, she could not thereafter be charged for a crime that stemmed from her immunized testimony. Whereas with use immunity, the witness could be charged with an offense stemming from her immunized testimony so long as the state or federal government was able to show that the evidence used against her was derived from an independent source and not from her immunized testimony.

>>1644405

they will get him independant of his testimony. you follow?

did not mean to reply to myself lol

>>1644366

they will get him independant of his testimony. you follow?

>Use Immunity

>States may adopt the theory of use immunity as the federal government has adopted. Use immunity permits the state or federal government to prosecute the witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness's immunized testimony. The state or federal government is prohibited from derivative use of immunized testimony for the prosecution of the immunized witness. If the state or federal government chooses to prosecute the witness for an offense they must prove that the evidence is based upon an independent and legitimate source. The state or federal government has an affirmative duty to prove that its evidence was derived from a legitimate source independent from the compelled testimony.

>Transactional Immunity

>The federal government no longer uses this type of immunity, however some states still use this method. Transactional immunity is defined as immunity that protects a witness from prosecution of the offense involved. For example, if the witness testified about participating in a narcotics transaction, she could not thereafter be charged for a crime that stemmed from her immunized testimony. Whereas with use immunity, the witness could be charged with an offense stemming from her immunized testimony so long as the state or federal government was able to show that the evidence used against her was derived from an independent source and not from her immunized testimony.

>>1644377

i think the point is just that they need to get him on the stand, this may be a trick to get that.

>>1644453

i noticed that too. really buthurt that some people dont seem to like them. LOL love it

>>1644450

think of the premise he is using

>>1644476

no you are absolutely wrong. the letter >>1644366 explicitly says "use".. learn to read because you are starting to glow..

http://www.rprvlaw.com/witness-immunity.html

>Use Immunity

>States may adopt the theory of use immunity as the FEDERAL government HAS ADOPTED. Use immunity permits the state or federal government to prosecute the witness using evidence obtained independently of the witness's immunized testimony. The state or federal government is prohibited from derivative use of immunized testimony for the prosecution of the immunized witness. If the state or federal government chooses to prosecute the witness for an offense they must prove that the evidence is based upon an independent and legitimate source. The state or federal government has an affirmative duty to prove that its evidence was derived from a legitimate source independent from the compelled testimony.

>Transactional Immunity

>The federal government no longer uses this type of immunity, however some states still use this method. Transactional immunity is defined as immunity that protects a witness from prosecution of the offense involved. For example, if the witness testified about participating in a narcotics transaction, she could not thereafter be charged for a crime that stemmed from her immunized testimony. Whereas with use immunity, the witness could be charged with an offense stemming from her immunized testimony so long as the state or federal government was able to show that the evidence used against her was derived from an independent source and not from her immunized testimony.