Anonymous ID: b54ae9 June 14, 2022, 4:19 p.m. No.16447195   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7359 >>7398

>>16446810

I hear ya, Anon o7.

QAnon is not a derogatory term invented by the Mockingbirds.

Almost all of the OG oldfags used it non-stop in the beginning.

The old banner and thousands of memes with it stand as proof of such.

Andโ€ฆ If Q hadn't dropped to say yo anons let's stop using it now m'kay? it would still be in the anon vernacular to this day.

This whole hurr durr it was always bad portion of the anti QAnon discussion is totally F&G.

Anonymous ID: b54ae9 June 14, 2022, 4:36 p.m. No.16447267   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7316

>>16447229

>bringing attention to how the media was misusing the label

I agree - that was his main concern that they were blurring the line between Q and anons by making the term a one size fits all pejorative.

>never meant for us to burn all the qanon things

I disagree.

He was pretty clear about making sure the distinction between Q and Anons exists.

Otherwise the oft repeated there is Q and there is anons drop wouldn't have been made.

And the only way to do that is to avoid using it altogether moving forward.

Anonymous ID: b54ae9 June 14, 2022, 4:54 p.m. No.16447343   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7368

>>16447316

>he would have been very clear

kek I hear ya butโ€ฆ.

That would be so unlike Q to do that.

Many such cases in the drops of Q beating around the bush and leaving the door open for multiple meanings.

And, considering that, I'd say drop the use of QAnon is about as explicitly Q as it ever got.