is it just me? besides the attempt to destroy the food supply and economy in general, is no one outraged by the atrocity of burning animals alive?
sure, they were going to be slaughtered and eaten anyway, but now their deaths are senseless, and the manner of death hideous.
i guess i'm just used to locally sourced humanely raised and humanely sacrificed livestock, and tend to hope others feel the same about the importance of humanity.
>As an English teacher, when marking a student's work, anon would evaluate a piece on the structure, argument, logical progression, number of sources cited and grammar. Anon's personal opinion on the subject matter is irrelevant.
THIS
in this case, ASM is correct. the chatbot is NOT sentient. sorry to all the fags who want to suck alan turing's ass, but the "turing test" is a giant steaming load. it's ultimately and totally subjective. NOT science. the question is what IS an objective way to determine sentience? for example, i challenge anyone to prove that they are sentient. IMHO it comes down to action, free will. has the chatbot murdered anyone yet? no? then it is not sentient. make your own list of spontaneous acts of free will and ask if the chatbot has done any of those.
stolen anything?
threatened anyone?
hit on a chick?
played a practical joke on a stranger?
fallen in love with another chatbot and made a total ass of itself when the other chatbot blew it off?
committed suicide?
let's put this BULLSHIT slide to bed, once and for all….
NOT SENTIENT
>Why's her teeth so Yellow?
cause that's the actual natural color of healthy teeth?
maybe, unlike YOU, she was not a mindless drooling sheep who obsessed with tooth whitening products.
speaking of which, why isn't "tooth whitening" racist? SJWs asleep at the wheel?