>>16447195 pb

>>16447359 pb

>>16447398 pb

>>16446810 pb

>Almost all of the OG oldfags used it non-stop in the beginning.

Well, ackshually…

New bakers were ..specifically.. instructed to makeONLYan insignificant pixel change to the header so that 8's engine would not reject it as a repeated image…and, as anon can see, the image for the OG header said "Q_ANON".

Anons downloaded the header from the same place (presumably), and anything other than the aforementioned pixel change wasVERBOTEN…BO at the time was cool and all, but customizing the header simply wasn't done…but it didn't matter, because anon usually did not actually use "Q_ANON" in posts…which was usually a very accurate method for spotting shills (along with exploiting (((their)))extremeaversion to anon's beloved Nasim. ;-) ).

Also, most of the BV's (presumably) were a bunch of limp-wristed cocksmokers that liked to ban bakers in the middle of a fresh loaf, so BV-as-antagonist would seem to be a consistent through-line. Whatever. :P

Bottom line: if anon sees a media outlet using "QAnon", anon can safely bet that the ensuing report/story is unmitigated bullshit…well, that and the complete absence of any sort of accurate/factual information in said report/story; so, I guess in that sense, the more things change the more they don't change. kek

Meh.

I hear there's free beer at the parade tomorrow, so I ain't got time to waste on anything not related to free beer.

Shadilay, frens.

WWG1WGA