> there is a unified science to understanding it.
Everything is Physics in one form or another.
Subjectivity doesn't change that it stems from physics.
Human behaviour is still physics though, including the understanding of physics.
As it is neurons firing in predictable patterns based on the existing environment.
The system being too complex for us to do proper testing doesn't mean that the system is random.
The constant in this case, isn't the researcher but the firing of neurons in an enclosed system.
>There is a science even more general than physics.
I'm still not convinced.
>Get ready.
Shit or get off the pot? Kek
You are failing to grasp the scale of the system.
You are talking about unpredictability, but it's unpredictability stemming from predictable systems, don't you see the contradiction?
No, the researcher can't possibly know the future because the researcher is not aware of (and never will be) all the interacting system making up his experience. This is why the researcher isn't the constant. The system is. The researcher is part of the system.
>Dialectic logic gibberish.
Poorly phrased. Look above for elaboration.
>But that's the subject of discussion.
No, the subject is a unified science.
>Researchers are more than neurons.
Yes, but his behaviour is the result of his neurons firing.
>Your ad hominem just shows your arguments are too weak to rely on themselves.
Ad hominem? Where? You mean when I asked you to shit or get off the pot? That's not an ad hominem it's an encouragement to share what you are telling us to 'get ready' for. instead of teasing.
>It's smearing and slandering the messenger and not the message.
FFS. Are you that thin skinned? It's an expression, a figure of speech.
Telling you to do spit it out instead of teasing is not smearing you. You are not that important dude.
Now read my posts again and realize how stupid you sound you fucking retard. ← that was an ad hominem