>>16456194 (lb)
>Kek, win.
Good job. Have a cookie.
>Now SEETHE, bitch.
You keep accusing me of insulting you. But I'm the one seething?
Don't you have pre-school to attend?
>Yes, you're seething so bad you needed to self-induce catharsis by bringing in references to past breads.
Dafuq you talking about faggot? Breadlines is social construct (kek). You claimed win at the end of a bread like a toddler. Because I didn't want to continue engaging with you when you can't even grasp a simple figure of speech.
Does the end of a bread mean that I can't make fun of you anymore?
By that logic, you are seething because you replied to me…
>Kek, moar ad hominem
Yes. It's what you deserve now.
>and projection
I didn't claim and announce win in a debate on an anonymous online forum. Kek
>are too complex for your puny little narcissistic mind can cope with.
Oh no! Is that an ad hominem? OMGZ!?!
My OCD prevents me from not replying to you.
Though I'm not sure what you think you caught?
Your post had no reference to the post it was a reply to - yet the content of the post seems to show that you think it is some sort of "epic own"…
I'm not a doctor, but I'm not sure you have a good grasp on reality. Maybe you should seek help?
>it's your inconsistent logic
I'm making fun of you for being a retard. No more logic needed.
You claim win. I call you retarded for thinking this is a competition. Simple as that.
<Please stop replying to me faggot.
>I never said I as a person wins.
You don't think people can read past breads. You literally did. You said that because I "gave up" as you called, that you won.
Lying is just retarded faggot.
>Anon was referring to the hierarchy of IDEAS.
Yes. And you thought that because I disengaged, that your IDEA won - hence making you the winner. And something that you felt the need to brag about like a spoiled kid.
<When all else fails claim to have caught the opponent and claim victory without any evidence. The only thing that matters is that I was right. Right?